Zimbabwean vs Chickasaw Married-couple Households
COMPARE
Zimbabwean
Chickasaw
Married-couple Households
Married-couple Households Comparison
Zimbabweans
Chickasaw
47.4%
MARRIED-COUPLE HOUSEHOLDS
89.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
124th/ 347
METRIC RANK
45.9%
MARRIED-COUPLE HOUSEHOLDS
22.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
195th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Zimbabwean vs Chickasaw Married-couple Households Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 69,192,017 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Zimbabweans and percentage of married-couple family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.082 and weighted average of 47.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,672,630 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and percentage of married-couple family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.197 and weighted average of 45.9%, a difference of 3.2%.
Married-couple Households Correlation Summary
Measurement | Zimbabwean | Chickasaw |
Minimum | 25.7% | 20.0% |
Maximum | 84.6% | 65.4% |
Range | 58.9% | 45.4% |
Mean | 51.5% | 47.8% |
Median | 49.5% | 48.9% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 43.8% | 43.2% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 59.8% | 53.2% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 16.0% | 10.0% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 12.8% | 8.7% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 12.6% | 8.6% |
Similar Demographics by Married-couple Households
Demographics Similar to Zimbabweans by Married-couple Households
In terms of married-couple households, the demographic groups most similar to Zimbabweans are Immigrants from Venezuela (47.4%, a difference of 0.010%), Australian (47.4%, a difference of 0.020%), Pakistani (47.3%, a difference of 0.050%), Okinawan (47.4%, a difference of 0.090%), and Celtic (47.3%, a difference of 0.10%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-couple Households |
French Canadians | 92.4 /100 | #117 | Exceptional 47.5% |
Immigrants | Germany | 92.4 /100 | #118 | Exceptional 47.5% |
Chileans | 92.2 /100 | #119 | Exceptional 47.5% |
Puget Sound Salish | 90.5 /100 | #120 | Exceptional 47.4% |
Immigrants | Eastern Europe | 90.3 /100 | #121 | Exceptional 47.4% |
Okinawans | 90.1 /100 | #122 | Exceptional 47.4% |
Immigrants | Venezuela | 89.3 /100 | #123 | Excellent 47.4% |
Zimbabweans | 89.2 /100 | #124 | Excellent 47.4% |
Australians | 89.0 /100 | #125 | Excellent 47.4% |
Pakistanis | 88.6 /100 | #126 | Excellent 47.3% |
Celtics | 88.1 /100 | #127 | Excellent 47.3% |
Immigrants | Peru | 87.9 /100 | #128 | Excellent 47.3% |
Immigrants | Iraq | 87.8 /100 | #129 | Excellent 47.3% |
Immigrants | Hungary | 87.8 /100 | #130 | Excellent 47.3% |
Immigrants | Denmark | 87.5 /100 | #131 | Excellent 47.3% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Married-couple Households
In terms of married-couple households, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Mexican American Indian (45.9%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from South America (45.9%, a difference of 0.030%), Taiwanese (45.9%, a difference of 0.040%), Cambodian (45.9%, a difference of 0.080%), and Immigrants from Northern Africa (46.0%, a difference of 0.10%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-couple Households |
South American Indians | 28.4 /100 | #188 | Fair 46.0% |
Immigrants | Latvia | 26.9 /100 | #189 | Fair 46.0% |
Immigrants | Kuwait | 25.6 /100 | #190 | Fair 46.0% |
Choctaw | 24.9 /100 | #191 | Fair 46.0% |
Immigrants | Northern Africa | 24.6 /100 | #192 | Fair 46.0% |
Taiwanese | 23.4 /100 | #193 | Fair 45.9% |
Mexican American Indians | 23.3 /100 | #194 | Fair 45.9% |
Chickasaw | 22.7 /100 | #195 | Fair 45.9% |
Immigrants | South America | 22.2 /100 | #196 | Fair 45.9% |
Cambodians | 21.3 /100 | #197 | Fair 45.9% |
Ottawa | 19.4 /100 | #198 | Poor 45.8% |
Carpatho Rusyns | 15.7 /100 | #199 | Poor 45.7% |
Potawatomi | 15.6 /100 | #200 | Poor 45.7% |
Immigrants | Serbia | 15.2 /100 | #201 | Poor 45.7% |
Immigrants | Central America | 14.2 /100 | #202 | Poor 45.7% |