Panamanian vs Chickasaw Married-couple Households
COMPARE
Panamanian
Chickasaw
Married-couple Households
Married-couple Households Comparison
Panamanians
Chickasaw
45.2%
MARRIED-COUPLE HOUSEHOLDS
5.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
217th/ 347
METRIC RANK
45.9%
MARRIED-COUPLE HOUSEHOLDS
22.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
195th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Panamanian vs Chickasaw Married-couple Households Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 281,067,413 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Panamanians and percentage of married-couple family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.461 and weighted average of 45.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,672,630 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and percentage of married-couple family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.197 and weighted average of 45.9%, a difference of 1.6%.
Married-couple Households Correlation Summary
Measurement | Panamanian | Chickasaw |
Minimum | 4.4% | 20.0% |
Maximum | 73.1% | 65.4% |
Range | 68.8% | 45.4% |
Mean | 43.6% | 47.8% |
Median | 45.6% | 48.9% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 37.2% | 43.2% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 51.9% | 53.2% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 14.7% | 10.0% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 14.2% | 8.7% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 14.0% | 8.6% |
Similar Demographics by Married-couple Households
Demographics Similar to Panamanians by Married-couple Households
In terms of married-couple households, the demographic groups most similar to Panamanians are Immigrants from Nepal (45.2%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Portugal (45.2%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from the Azores (45.2%, a difference of 0.030%), Nicaraguan (45.2%, a difference of 0.030%), and Japanese (45.2%, a difference of 0.040%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-couple Households |
Cubans | 7.7 /100 | #210 | Tragic 45.4% |
Immigrants | Spain | 7.3 /100 | #211 | Tragic 45.3% |
Creek | 6.4 /100 | #212 | Tragic 45.3% |
Yakama | 5.8 /100 | #213 | Tragic 45.2% |
Japanese | 5.7 /100 | #214 | Tragic 45.2% |
Immigrants | Nepal | 5.6 /100 | #215 | Tragic 45.2% |
Immigrants | Portugal | 5.6 /100 | #216 | Tragic 45.2% |
Panamanians | 5.5 /100 | #217 | Tragic 45.2% |
Immigrants | Azores | 5.3 /100 | #218 | Tragic 45.2% |
Nicaraguans | 5.3 /100 | #219 | Tragic 45.2% |
Immigrants | Thailand | 5.1 /100 | #220 | Tragic 45.2% |
Tlingit-Haida | 4.9 /100 | #221 | Tragic 45.1% |
Immigrants | Laos | 4.6 /100 | #222 | Tragic 45.1% |
Immigrants | Cambodia | 2.7 /100 | #223 | Tragic 44.9% |
Immigrants | Micronesia | 2.6 /100 | #224 | Tragic 44.9% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Married-couple Households
In terms of married-couple households, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Mexican American Indian (45.9%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from South America (45.9%, a difference of 0.030%), Taiwanese (45.9%, a difference of 0.040%), Cambodian (45.9%, a difference of 0.080%), and Immigrants from Northern Africa (46.0%, a difference of 0.10%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-couple Households |
South American Indians | 28.4 /100 | #188 | Fair 46.0% |
Immigrants | Latvia | 26.9 /100 | #189 | Fair 46.0% |
Immigrants | Kuwait | 25.6 /100 | #190 | Fair 46.0% |
Choctaw | 24.9 /100 | #191 | Fair 46.0% |
Immigrants | Northern Africa | 24.6 /100 | #192 | Fair 46.0% |
Taiwanese | 23.4 /100 | #193 | Fair 45.9% |
Mexican American Indians | 23.3 /100 | #194 | Fair 45.9% |
Chickasaw | 22.7 /100 | #195 | Fair 45.9% |
Immigrants | South America | 22.2 /100 | #196 | Fair 45.9% |
Cambodians | 21.3 /100 | #197 | Fair 45.9% |
Ottawa | 19.4 /100 | #198 | Poor 45.8% |
Carpatho Rusyns | 15.7 /100 | #199 | Poor 45.7% |
Potawatomi | 15.6 /100 | #200 | Poor 45.7% |
Immigrants | Serbia | 15.2 /100 | #201 | Poor 45.7% |
Immigrants | Central America | 14.2 /100 | #202 | Poor 45.7% |