Immigrants from Ecuador vs Chickasaw Married-couple Households

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 270,883,052 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Ecuador and percentage of married-couple family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.678 and weighted average of 42.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,672,630 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and percentage of married-couple family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.197 and weighted average of 45.9%, a difference of 7.1%.

Married-couple Households Correlation Summary

Measurement	Immigrants from Ecuador	Chickasaw
Minimum	34.8%	20.0%
Maximum	100.0%	65.4%
Range	65.2%	45.4%
Mean	47.2%	47.8%
Median	44.7%	48.9%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	40.8%	43.2%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	49.2%	53.2%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	8.5%	10.0%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	10.9%	8.7%
Standard Deviation (Population)	10.8%	8.6%

Similar Demographics by Married-couple Households

Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Ecuador by Married-couple Households

In terms of married-couple households, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Ecuador are Sierra Leonean (42.9%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Guatemala (42.8%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Africa (42.9%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Eastern Africa (42.9%, a difference of 0.19%), and Immigrants from Ethiopia (43.1%, a difference of 0.45%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Married-couple Households
Ethiopians	0.1 /100 \| #273	Tragic 43.2%
Nigerians	0.1 /100 \| #274	Tragic 43.2%
Immigrants \| Bangladesh	0.0 /100 \| #275	Tragic 43.1%
Immigrants \| Ethiopia	0.0 /100 \| #276	Tragic 43.1%
Immigrants \| Eastern Africa	0.0 /100 \| #277	Tragic 42.9%
Immigrants \| Africa	0.0 /100 \| #278	Tragic 42.9%
Sierra Leoneans	0.0 /100 \| #279	Tragic 42.9%
Immigrants \| Ecuador	0.0 /100 \| #280	Tragic 42.9%
Immigrants \| Guatemala	0.0 /100 \| #281	Tragic 42.8%
Bermudans	0.0 /100 \| #282	Tragic 42.4%
Inupiat	0.0 /100 \| #283	Tragic 42.4%
Cheyenne	0.0 /100 \| #284	Tragic 42.3%
Ghanaians	0.0 /100 \| #285	Tragic 42.2%
Belizeans	0.0 /100 \| #286	Tragic 42.2%
Chippewa	0.0 /100 \| #287	Tragic 42.1%

Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Married-couple Households

In terms of married-couple households, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Mexican American Indian (45.9%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from South America (45.9%, a difference of 0.030%), Taiwanese (45.9%, a difference of 0.040%), Cambodian (45.9%, a difference of 0.080%), and Immigrants from Northern Africa (46.0%, a difference of 0.10%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Married-couple Households
South American Indians	28.4 /100 \| #188	Fair 46.0%
Immigrants \| Latvia	26.9 /100 \| #189	Fair 46.0%
Immigrants \| Kuwait	25.6 /100 \| #190	Fair 46.0%
Choctaw	24.9 /100 \| #191	Fair 46.0%
Immigrants \| Northern Africa	24.6 /100 \| #192	Fair 46.0%
Taiwanese	23.4 /100 \| #193	Fair 45.9%
Mexican American Indians	23.3 /100 \| #194	Fair 45.9%
Chickasaw	22.7 /100 \| #195	Fair 45.9%
Immigrants \| South America	22.2 /100 \| #196	Fair 45.9%
Cambodians	21.3 /100 \| #197	Fair 45.9%
Ottawa	19.4 /100 \| #198	Poor 45.8%
Carpatho Rusyns	15.7 /100 \| #199	Poor 45.7%
Potawatomi	15.6 /100 \| #200	Poor 45.7%
Immigrants \| Serbia	15.2 /100 \| #201	Poor 45.7%
Immigrants \| Central America	14.2 /100 \| #202	Poor 45.7%