Central American Indian vs Chickasaw Married-couple Households
COMPARE
Central American Indian
Chickasaw
Married-couple Households
Married-couple Households Comparison
Central American Indians
Chickasaw
43.8%
MARRIED-COUPLE HOUSEHOLDS
0.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
258th/ 347
METRIC RANK
45.9%
MARRIED-COUPLE HOUSEHOLDS
22.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
195th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Central American Indian vs Chickasaw Married-couple Households Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 326,060,937 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Central American Indians and percentage of married-couple family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.071 and weighted average of 43.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,672,630 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and percentage of married-couple family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.197 and weighted average of 45.9%, a difference of 4.9%.
Married-couple Households Correlation Summary
Measurement | Central American Indian | Chickasaw |
Minimum | 20.1% | 20.0% |
Maximum | 86.0% | 65.4% |
Range | 65.9% | 45.4% |
Mean | 45.4% | 47.8% |
Median | 44.1% | 48.9% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 39.0% | 43.2% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 50.2% | 53.2% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 11.3% | 10.0% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 12.5% | 8.7% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 12.4% | 8.6% |
Similar Demographics by Married-couple Households
Demographics Similar to Central American Indians by Married-couple Households
In terms of married-couple households, the demographic groups most similar to Central American Indians are Iroquois (43.7%, a difference of 0.030%), Blackfeet (43.8%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Cameroon (43.7%, a difference of 0.12%), Ugandan (43.8%, a difference of 0.20%), and Alaskan Athabascan (43.6%, a difference of 0.25%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-couple Households |
German Russians | 0.4 /100 | #251 | Tragic 44.0% |
Seminole | 0.4 /100 | #252 | Tragic 44.0% |
Central Americans | 0.3 /100 | #253 | Tragic 43.9% |
Apache | 0.3 /100 | #254 | Tragic 43.9% |
Shoshone | 0.3 /100 | #255 | Tragic 43.9% |
Ugandans | 0.3 /100 | #256 | Tragic 43.8% |
Blackfeet | 0.2 /100 | #257 | Tragic 43.8% |
Central American Indians | 0.2 /100 | #258 | Tragic 43.8% |
Iroquois | 0.2 /100 | #259 | Tragic 43.7% |
Immigrants | Cameroon | 0.2 /100 | #260 | Tragic 43.7% |
Alaskan Athabascans | 0.2 /100 | #261 | Tragic 43.6% |
Vietnamese | 0.2 /100 | #262 | Tragic 43.6% |
Cree | 0.1 /100 | #263 | Tragic 43.6% |
Bangladeshis | 0.1 /100 | #264 | Tragic 43.5% |
Moroccans | 0.1 /100 | #265 | Tragic 43.5% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Married-couple Households
In terms of married-couple households, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Mexican American Indian (45.9%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from South America (45.9%, a difference of 0.030%), Taiwanese (45.9%, a difference of 0.040%), Cambodian (45.9%, a difference of 0.080%), and Immigrants from Northern Africa (46.0%, a difference of 0.10%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-couple Households |
South American Indians | 28.4 /100 | #188 | Fair 46.0% |
Immigrants | Latvia | 26.9 /100 | #189 | Fair 46.0% |
Immigrants | Kuwait | 25.6 /100 | #190 | Fair 46.0% |
Choctaw | 24.9 /100 | #191 | Fair 46.0% |
Immigrants | Northern Africa | 24.6 /100 | #192 | Fair 46.0% |
Taiwanese | 23.4 /100 | #193 | Fair 45.9% |
Mexican American Indians | 23.3 /100 | #194 | Fair 45.9% |
Chickasaw | 22.7 /100 | #195 | Fair 45.9% |
Immigrants | South America | 22.2 /100 | #196 | Fair 45.9% |
Cambodians | 21.3 /100 | #197 | Fair 45.9% |
Ottawa | 19.4 /100 | #198 | Poor 45.8% |
Carpatho Rusyns | 15.7 /100 | #199 | Poor 45.7% |
Potawatomi | 15.6 /100 | #200 | Poor 45.7% |
Immigrants | Serbia | 15.2 /100 | #201 | Poor 45.7% |
Immigrants | Central America | 14.2 /100 | #202 | Poor 45.7% |