Immigrants from Belgium vs Chickasaw Family Households
COMPARE
Immigrants from Belgium
Chickasaw
Family Households
Family Households Comparison
Immigrants from Belgium
Chickasaw
63.0%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
0.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
278th/ 347
METRIC RANK
64.4%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
61.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
163rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Belgium vs Chickasaw Family Households Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 146,698,570 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Belgium and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.007 and weighted average of 63.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,674,365 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.210 and weighted average of 64.4%, a difference of 2.2%.
Family Households Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Belgium | Chickasaw |
Minimum | 29.4% | 40.0% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
Range | 70.6% | 60.0% |
Mean | 66.4% | 67.1% |
Median | 67.5% | 67.0% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 60.4% | 62.2% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 73.3% | 72.8% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 12.9% | 10.6% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 14.5% | 8.9% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 14.4% | 8.8% |
Similar Demographics by Family Households
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Belgium by Family Households
In terms of family households, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Belgium are Ottawa (63.0%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Yemen (63.0%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Bulgaria (63.0%, a difference of 0.050%), Serbian (63.0%, a difference of 0.090%), and Lumbee (63.1%, a difference of 0.10%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households |
Immigrants | Croatia | 0.3 /100 | #271 | Tragic 63.1% |
Immigrants | Turkey | 0.3 /100 | #272 | Tragic 63.1% |
Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 0.3 /100 | #273 | Tragic 63.1% |
Lumbee | 0.3 /100 | #274 | Tragic 63.1% |
West Indians | 0.3 /100 | #275 | Tragic 63.1% |
Serbians | 0.3 /100 | #276 | Tragic 63.0% |
Ottawa | 0.3 /100 | #277 | Tragic 63.0% |
Immigrants | Belgium | 0.2 /100 | #278 | Tragic 63.0% |
Immigrants | Yemen | 0.2 /100 | #279 | Tragic 63.0% |
Immigrants | Bulgaria | 0.2 /100 | #280 | Tragic 63.0% |
Estonians | 0.2 /100 | #281 | Tragic 62.9% |
New Zealanders | 0.1 /100 | #282 | Tragic 62.9% |
Immigrants | Denmark | 0.1 /100 | #283 | Tragic 62.9% |
Australians | 0.1 /100 | #284 | Tragic 62.8% |
Mongolians | 0.1 /100 | #285 | Tragic 62.8% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Family Households
In terms of family households, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are British (64.4%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from England (64.4%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Nigeria (64.4%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Southern Europe (64.4%, a difference of 0.020%), and Scotch-Irish (64.4%, a difference of 0.030%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households |
Czechs | 67.0 /100 | #156 | Good 64.5% |
Canadians | 66.6 /100 | #157 | Good 64.4% |
Lebanese | 66.4 /100 | #158 | Good 64.4% |
Germans | 65.8 /100 | #159 | Good 64.4% |
Immigrants | Moldova | 65.2 /100 | #160 | Good 64.4% |
Immigrants | England | 62.6 /100 | #161 | Good 64.4% |
British | 61.6 /100 | #162 | Good 64.4% |
Chickasaw | 61.5 /100 | #163 | Good 64.4% |
Immigrants | Nigeria | 60.1 /100 | #164 | Good 64.4% |
Immigrants | Southern Europe | 60.0 /100 | #165 | Good 64.4% |
Scotch-Irish | 59.2 /100 | #166 | Average 64.4% |
Irish | 57.9 /100 | #167 | Average 64.4% |
Hondurans | 57.5 /100 | #168 | Average 64.4% |
Iraqis | 56.0 /100 | #169 | Average 64.4% |
Armenians | 55.9 /100 | #170 | Average 64.4% |