Immigrants from Belgium vs Chickasaw Female Unemployment
COMPARE
Immigrants from Belgium
Chickasaw
Female Unemployment
Female Unemployment Comparison
Immigrants from Belgium
Chickasaw
4.9%
FEMALE UNEMPLOYMENT
98.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
63rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.1%
FEMALE UNEMPLOYMENT
83.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
138th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Belgium vs Chickasaw Female Unemployment Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 146,408,368 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Belgium and unemploymnet rate among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.639 and weighted average of 4.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,184,773 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and unemploymnet rate among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.454 and weighted average of 5.1%, a difference of 4.1%.
Female Unemployment Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Belgium | Chickasaw |
| Minimum | 1.0% | 1.8% |
| Maximum | 29.0% | 20.0% |
| Range | 28.0% | 18.2% |
| Mean | 5.9% | 6.1% |
| Median | 4.7% | 5.2% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.4% | 3.7% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 6.2% | 7.0% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.8% | 3.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.0% | 3.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.9% | 3.8% |
Similar Demographics by Female Unemployment
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Belgium by Female Unemployment
In terms of female unemployment, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Belgium are Celtic (4.9%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Nepal (4.9%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Scotland (4.9%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Canada (4.9%, a difference of 0.12%), and Immigrants from North America (4.9%, a difference of 0.19%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Unemployment |
| Serbians | 99.0 /100 | #56 | Exceptional 4.9% |
| Icelanders | 98.8 /100 | #57 | Exceptional 4.9% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 98.8 /100 | #58 | Exceptional 4.9% |
| Bhutanese | 98.7 /100 | #59 | Exceptional 4.9% |
| Immigrants | Scotland | 98.6 /100 | #60 | Exceptional 4.9% |
| Immigrants | Canada | 98.6 /100 | #61 | Exceptional 4.9% |
| Immigrants | Nepal | 98.6 /100 | #62 | Exceptional 4.9% |
| Immigrants | Belgium | 98.5 /100 | #63 | Exceptional 4.9% |
| Celtics | 98.5 /100 | #64 | Exceptional 4.9% |
| Immigrants | North America | 98.3 /100 | #65 | Exceptional 4.9% |
| Hungarians | 98.3 /100 | #66 | Exceptional 4.9% |
| Cubans | 98.3 /100 | #67 | Exceptional 4.9% |
| Tlingit-Haida | 98.3 /100 | #68 | Exceptional 4.9% |
| Immigrants | Ireland | 98.2 /100 | #69 | Exceptional 4.9% |
| Osage | 98.2 /100 | #70 | Exceptional 4.9% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Female Unemployment
In terms of female unemployment, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Immigrants from Eastern Asia (5.1%, a difference of 0.020%), Pakistani (5.1%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from France (5.1%, a difference of 0.060%), Indian (Asian) (5.1%, a difference of 0.11%), and Immigrants from Latvia (5.1%, a difference of 0.15%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Unemployment |
| Immigrants | Ethiopia | 85.4 /100 | #131 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 85.0 /100 | #132 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Hong Kong | 84.8 /100 | #133 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Eritrea | 84.6 /100 | #134 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Latvia | 84.6 /100 | #135 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Indians (Asian) | 84.2 /100 | #136 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Pakistanis | 83.8 /100 | #137 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Chickasaw | 83.2 /100 | #138 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 83.0 /100 | #139 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Immigrants | France | 82.7 /100 | #140 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Europe | 81.5 /100 | #141 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Palestinians | 80.8 /100 | #142 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 80.7 /100 | #143 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Jordan | 80.4 /100 | #144 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Oceania | 79.5 /100 | #145 | Good 5.2% |