Israeli vs Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Unemployment Among Seniors over 75 years

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 137,607,512 people shows a significant negative correlation between the proportion of Israelis and unemployment rate among seniors over the age of 75 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.659 and weighted average of 7.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 114,707,279 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and unemployment rate among seniors over the age of 75 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.412 and weighted average of 7.7%, a difference of 4.0%.

Unemployment Among Seniors over 75 years Correlation Summary

Measurement	Israeli	Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar
Minimum	2.5%	1.1%
Maximum	12.7%	61.4%
Range	10.2%	60.3%
Mean	6.6%	10.9%
Median	6.0%	8.1%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	4.1%	5.7%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	8.3%	13.2%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	4.2%	7.5%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	2.9%	11.2%
Standard Deviation (Population)	2.8%	11.0%

Demographics Similar to Israelis and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar by Unemployment Among Seniors over 75 years

In terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years, the demographic groups most similar to Israelis are Immigrants from Cuba (7.4%, a difference of 0.080%), Cypriot (7.4%, a difference of 0.33%), Immigrants from Uruguay (7.5%, a difference of 1.2%), South African (7.5%, a difference of 1.4%), and Immigrants from Barbados (7.6%, a difference of 1.8%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar are Colville (7.7%, a difference of 0.13%), Ugandan (7.7%, a difference of 0.16%), Kiowa (7.7%, a difference of 0.20%), Immigrants from Hungary (7.7%, a difference of 0.21%), and Pueblo (7.7%, a difference of 0.23%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Unemployment Among Seniors over 75 years
Cypriots	100.0 /100 \| #22	Exceptional 7.4%
Israelis	100.0 /100 \| #23	Exceptional 7.4%
Immigrants \| Cuba	100.0 /100 \| #24	Exceptional 7.4%
Immigrants \| Uruguay	100.0 /100 \| #25	Exceptional 7.5%
South Africans	100.0 /100 \| #26	Exceptional 7.5%
Immigrants \| Barbados	100.0 /100 \| #27	Exceptional 7.6%
Immigrants \| Israel	100.0 /100 \| #28	Exceptional 7.6%
Immigrants \| Iran	100.0 /100 \| #29	Exceptional 7.6%
Immigrants \| Sweden	100.0 /100 \| #30	Exceptional 7.6%
Guyanese	100.0 /100 \| #31	Exceptional 7.6%
Immigrants \| Hong Kong	100.0 /100 \| #32	Exceptional 7.6%
Cambodians	100.0 /100 \| #33	Exceptional 7.6%
Immigrants \| Eritrea	100.0 /100 \| #34	Exceptional 7.7%
Immigrants \| Norway	100.0 /100 \| #35	Exceptional 7.7%
Luxembourgers	100.0 /100 \| #36	Exceptional 7.7%
Immigrants \| Hungary	100.0 /100 \| #37	Exceptional 7.7%
Kiowa	100.0 /100 \| #38	Exceptional 7.7%
Ugandans	100.0 /100 \| #39	Exceptional 7.7%
Colville	100.0 /100 \| #40	Exceptional 7.7%
Immigrants \| Burma/Myanmar	100.0 /100 \| #41	Exceptional 7.7%
Pueblo	100.0 /100 \| #42	Exceptional 7.7%