Immigrants from Malaysia vs Immigrants from Chile Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Malaysia
Immigrants from Chile
Poverty
Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Malaysia
Immigrants from Chile
12.0%
POVERTY
72.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
149th/ 347
METRIC RANK
12.2%
POVERTY
56.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
167th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Malaysia vs Immigrants from Chile Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 197,932,153 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Malaysia and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.105 and weighted average of 12.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 218,605,054 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Chile and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.178 and weighted average of 12.2%, a difference of 1.8%.
Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Malaysia | Immigrants from Chile |
Minimum | 2.6% | 2.2% |
Maximum | 41.8% | 29.7% |
Range | 39.3% | 27.5% |
Mean | 11.8% | 11.4% |
Median | 10.4% | 10.0% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 7.5% | 8.2% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 13.5% | 13.8% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.0% | 5.6% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.8% | 5.8% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.8% | 5.7% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Malaysia and Immigrants from Chile by Poverty
In terms of poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Malaysia are Immigrants from Germany (12.0%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Kazakhstan (12.0%, a difference of 0.050%), Samoan (12.0%, a difference of 0.090%), Armenian (12.1%, a difference of 0.60%), and Immigrants from Northern Africa (12.1%, a difference of 1.0%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Chile are Venezuelan (12.2%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Venezuela (12.2%, a difference of 0.020%), Colombian (12.2%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Albania (12.2%, a difference of 0.11%), and Immigrants from Ethiopia (12.2%, a difference of 0.19%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Poverty |
Immigrants | Germany | 72.7 /100 | #148 | Good 12.0% |
Immigrants | Malaysia | 72.7 /100 | #149 | Good 12.0% |
Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 72.3 /100 | #150 | Good 12.0% |
Samoans | 71.9 /100 | #151 | Good 12.0% |
Armenians | 67.6 /100 | #152 | Good 12.1% |
Immigrants | Northern Africa | 63.9 /100 | #153 | Good 12.1% |
Guamanians/Chamorros | 63.9 /100 | #154 | Good 12.1% |
Hungarians | 63.6 /100 | #155 | Good 12.2% |
Scotch-Irish | 62.6 /100 | #156 | Good 12.2% |
Costa Ricans | 62.2 /100 | #157 | Good 12.2% |
Taiwanese | 61.8 /100 | #158 | Good 12.2% |
Pennsylvania Germans | 60.8 /100 | #159 | Good 12.2% |
Immigrants | Nepal | 60.4 /100 | #160 | Good 12.2% |
Immigrants | Fiji | 59.1 /100 | #161 | Average 12.2% |
Ethiopians | 59.1 /100 | #162 | Average 12.2% |
Immigrants | Ethiopia | 58.6 /100 | #163 | Average 12.2% |
Colombians | 57.8 /100 | #164 | Average 12.2% |
Immigrants | Albania | 57.7 /100 | #165 | Average 12.2% |
Venezuelans | 56.9 /100 | #166 | Average 12.2% |
Immigrants | Chile | 56.7 /100 | #167 | Average 12.2% |
Immigrants | Venezuela | 56.5 /100 | #168 | Average 12.2% |