Ecuadorian vs Comanche Family Poverty
COMPARE
Ecuadorian
 Comanche
 Family Poverty
Family Poverty Comparison
Ecuadorians
Comanche
10.8%
FAMILY POVERTY
0.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
254th/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.0%
FAMILY POVERTY
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
267th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Ecuadorian vs Comanche Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 317,108,203 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Ecuadorians and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.144 and weighted average of 10.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 109,722,823 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Comanche and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.506 and weighted average of 11.0%, a difference of 2.5%.
 
Family Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Ecuadorian | Comanche | 
| Minimum | 1.5% | 4.3% | 
| Maximum | 21.9% | 50.0% | 
| Range | 20.5% | 45.7% | 
| Mean | 10.5% | 14.5% | 
| Median | 10.0% | 13.1% | 
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 8.1% | 10.2% | 
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 12.8% | 15.7% | 
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.6% | 5.5% | 
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.2% | 8.6% | 
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.2% | 8.4% | 
Demographics Similar to Ecuadorians and Comanche by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Ecuadorians are Immigrants from Western Africa (10.7%, a difference of 0.30%), Immigrants from Liberia (10.8%, a difference of 0.37%), Immigrants from Zaire (10.7%, a difference of 0.41%), Iroquois (10.7%, a difference of 0.53%), and Chickasaw (10.8%, a difference of 0.64%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Comanche are Immigrants from El Salvador (11.0%, a difference of 0.010%), Jamaican (11.1%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Ecuador (11.1%, a difference of 0.58%), Immigrants from Nicaragua (11.1%, a difference of 0.59%), and Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago (10.9%, a difference of 0.91%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty | 
| Salvadorans | 0.3 /100 | #250  | Tragic 10.7%  | 
| Iroquois | 0.3 /100 | #251  | Tragic 10.7%  | 
| Immigrants | Zaire | 0.3 /100 | #252  | Tragic 10.7%  | 
| Immigrants | Western Africa | 0.3 /100 | #253  | Tragic 10.7%  | 
| Ecuadorians | 0.2 /100 | #254  | Tragic 10.8%  | 
| Immigrants | Liberia | 0.2 /100 | #255  | Tragic 10.8%  | 
| Chickasaw | 0.2 /100 | #256  | Tragic 10.8%  | 
| Immigrants | Ghana | 0.2 /100 | #257  | Tragic 10.8%  | 
| Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.2 /100 | #258  | Tragic 10.9%  | 
| Mexican American Indians | 0.2 /100 | #259  | Tragic 10.9%  | 
| Bangladeshis | 0.2 /100 | #260  | Tragic 10.9%  | 
| Shoshone | 0.2 /100 | #261  | Tragic 10.9%  | 
| Spanish American Indians | 0.2 /100 | #262  | Tragic 10.9%  | 
| Cape Verdeans | 0.1 /100 | #263  | Tragic 10.9%  | 
| Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 0.1 /100 | #264  | Tragic 10.9%  | 
| Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 0.1 /100 | #265  | Tragic 10.9%  | 
| Immigrants | El Salvador | 0.1 /100 | #266  | Tragic 11.0%  | 
| Comanche | 0.1 /100 | #267  | Tragic 11.0%  | 
| Jamaicans | 0.1 /100 | #268  | Tragic 11.1%  | 
| Immigrants | Ecuador | 0.1 /100 | #269  | Tragic 11.1%  | 
| Immigrants | Nicaragua | 0.1 /100 | #270  | Tragic 11.1%  |