Cajun vs Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 78,861,159 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina within Cajun communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.173. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Cajuns within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.120% in Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Cajuns corresponds to an increase of 120.4 Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Cajun and Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (33.9% compared to 24.8%, a difference of 36.4%), median female earnings ($34,034 compared to $38,886, a difference of 14.3%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($83,015 compared to $94,288, a difference of 13.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($52,325 compared to $52,869, a difference of 1.0%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($82,393 compared to $88,819, a difference of 7.8%), and median earnings ($42,189 compared to $45,600, a difference of 8.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Cajun and Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (19.1% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 57.0%), single father poverty (23.1% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 52.2%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (19.9% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 48.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.9% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 14.5%), married-couple family poverty (5.6% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 16.0%), and receiving food stamps (13.7% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 20.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Cajun and Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (12.5% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 45.5%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.7% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 41.5%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (8.0% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 41.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 2.4%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.5% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 3.7%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.3% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 15.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Cajun and Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.8% compared to 41.8%, a difference of 10.6%), in labor force | age > 16 (61.8% compared to 66.5%, a difference of 7.6%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (75.5% compared to 80.8%, a difference of 7.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.1% compared to 78.1%, a difference of 4.1%), in labor force | age 25-29 (82.5% compared to 86.3%, a difference of 4.5%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (82.0% compared to 85.8%, a difference of 4.6%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Cajun and Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (41.0% compared to 30.3%, a difference of 35.1%), single mother households (7.3% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 15.5%), and divorced or separated (13.4% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 8.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.17 compared to 3.15, a difference of 0.73%), currently married (47.1% compared to 46.1%, a difference of 2.2%), and family households with children (27.7% compared to 26.8%, a difference of 3.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Cajun and Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.4% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 17.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.0% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 11.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.3% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 10.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.7% compared to 90.1%, a difference of 1.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.7% compared to 53.8%, a difference of 7.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.3% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 10.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Cajun and Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (11.0% compared to 14.3%, a difference of 30.5%), bachelor's degree (29.6% compared to 37.6%, a difference of 26.8%), and associate's degree (37.4% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 23.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 9th grade (95.1% compared to 95.2%, a difference of 0.10%), 8th grade (96.3% compared to 96.2%, a difference of 0.13%), and nursery school (98.4% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.40%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Cajun and Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (3.1% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 44.6%), disability age 35 to 64 (15.3% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 34.4%), and disability age under 5 (1.6% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 27.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.8% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 2.1%), disability age over 75 (50.7% compared to 46.8%, a difference of 8.2%), and self-care disability (2.9% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 19.2%).