Immigrants from Northern Africa vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Community Comparison
COMPARE
Immigrants from Northern Africa
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Immigrants from Northern Africa
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia
7,346
SOCIAL INDEX
70.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
121st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
8,836
SOCIAL INDEX
85.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
45th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Integration in Immigrants from Northern Africa Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 162,803,505 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Czechoslovakia within Immigrant from Northern Africa communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.184. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Northern Africa within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.005% in Immigrants from Czechoslovakia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Northern Africa corresponds to an increase of 4.7 Immigrants from Czechoslovakia.
Immigrants from Northern Africa vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Northern Africa and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($46,531 compared to $51,770, a difference of 11.3%), wage/income gap (25.2% compared to 27.3%, a difference of 8.1%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($99,232 compared to $106,888, a difference of 7.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($53,185 compared to $54,352, a difference of 2.2%), median female earnings ($42,084 compared to $43,571, a difference of 3.5%), and median earnings ($49,648 compared to $52,361, a difference of 5.5%).
| Income Metric | Immigrants from Northern Africa | Immigrants from Czechoslovakia |
| Per Capita Income | Exceptional $46,531 | Exceptional $51,770 |
| Median Family Income | Exceptional $108,161 | Exceptional $116,165 |
| Median Household Income | Exceptional $90,026 | Exceptional $95,319 |
| Median Earnings | Exceptional $49,648 | Exceptional $52,361 |
| Median Male Earnings | Exceptional $58,008 | Exceptional $62,217 |
| Median Female Earnings | Exceptional $42,084 | Exceptional $43,571 |
| Householder Age | Under 25 years | Exceptional $53,185 | Exceptional $54,352 |
| Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Exceptional $99,232 | Exceptional $106,888 |
| Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Exceptional $105,430 | Exceptional $111,914 |
| Householder Age | Over 65 years | Excellent $62,522 | Exceptional $66,376 |
| Wage/Income Gap | Good 25.2% | Tragic 27.3% |
Immigrants from Northern Africa vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Northern Africa and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (8.8% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 14.7%), receiving food stamps (11.0% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 14.0%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (15.8% compared to 13.9%, a difference of 13.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (11.9% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 1.2%), single mother poverty (28.0% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 2.4%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.7% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 3.1%).
| Poverty Metric | Immigrants from Northern Africa | Immigrants from Czechoslovakia |
| Poverty | Good 12.1% | Exceptional 11.0% |
| Families | Good 8.8% | Exceptional 7.7% |
| Males | Average 11.1% | Exceptional 10.0% |
| Females | Good 13.2% | Exceptional 11.9% |
| Females 18 to 24 years | Excellent 19.7% | Exceptional 19.1% |
| Females 25 to 34 years | Exceptional 12.6% | Exceptional 12.1% |
| Children Under 5 years | Excellent 16.4% | Exceptional 14.8% |
| Children Under 16 years | Good 15.8% | Exceptional 13.9% |
| Boys Under 16 years | Good 16.0% | Exceptional 14.4% |
| Girls Under 16 years | Good 16.0% | Exceptional 14.2% |
| Single Males | Exceptional 11.9% | Exceptional 12.1% |
| Single Females | Exceptional 20.0% | Exceptional 19.0% |
| Single Fathers | Exceptional 15.3% | Good 16.2% |
| Single Mothers | Exceptional 28.0% | Exceptional 27.4% |
| Married Couples | Average 5.2% | Exceptional 4.6% |
| Seniors Over 65 years | Average 11.0% | Exceptional 10.0% |
| Seniors Over 75 years | Fair 12.5% | Excellent 11.7% |
| Receiving Food Stamps | Excellent 11.0% | Exceptional 9.6% |
Immigrants from Northern Africa vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Northern Africa and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.3% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 5.5%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.4% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 5.5%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.7% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 5.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.5% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 0.20%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.5% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 0.53%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 1.4%).
| Unemployment Metric | Immigrants from Northern Africa | Immigrants from Czechoslovakia |
| Unemployment | Good 5.2% | Exceptional 5.0% |
| Males | Good 5.2% | Exceptional 5.1% |
| Females | Good 5.2% | Exceptional 5.0% |
| Youth < 25 | Good 11.5% | Good 11.5% |
| Age | 16 to 19 years | Good 17.4% | Fair 17.8% |
| Age | 20 to 24 years | Excellent 10.2% | Average 10.3% |
| Age | 25 to 29 years | Exceptional 6.3% | Good 6.6% |
| Age | 30 to 34 years | Exceptional 5.1% | Excellent 5.3% |
| Age | 35 to 44 years | Excellent 4.5% | Excellent 4.5% |
| Age | 45 to 54 years | Average 4.5% | Excellent 4.4% |
| Age | 55 to 59 years | Good 4.8% | Fair 4.8% |
| Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Fair 4.9% |
| Age | 65 to 74 years | Poor 5.5% | Good 5.3% |
| Seniors > 65 | Poor 5.2% | Good 5.1% |
| Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 8.2% | Exceptional 8.4% |
| Women w/ Children < 6 | Excellent 7.4% | Exceptional 7.0% |
| Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 8.7% | Fair 9.0% |
| Women w/ Children < 18 | Average 5.4% | Excellent 5.2% |
Immigrants from Northern Africa vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Northern Africa and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (66.6% compared to 64.8%, a difference of 2.8%), in labor force | age 16-19 (35.9% compared to 36.6%, a difference of 1.8%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.3% compared to 79.9%, a difference of 0.48%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.8% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.060%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.3% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 0.090%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.2% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 0.22%).
| Labor Participation Metric | Immigrants from Northern Africa | Immigrants from Czechoslovakia |
| In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Exceptional 66.6% | Poor 64.8% |
| In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Exceptional 80.3% | Excellent 79.9% |
| In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Poor 35.9% | Average 36.6% |
| In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Poor 74.6% | Average 75.0% |
| In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Exceptional 85.2% | Exceptional 85.4% |
| In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Exceptional 85.2% | Exceptional 85.4% |
| In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Exceptional 84.8% | Exceptional 84.8% |
| In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Exceptional 83.3% | Exceptional 83.4% |
Immigrants from Northern Africa vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Northern Africa and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.2% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 16.1%), family households with children (27.8% compared to 26.2%, a difference of 6.1%), and single father households (2.1% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 5.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.5% compared to 63.4%, a difference of 0.14%), divorced or separated (11.5% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 1.8%), and average family size (3.22 compared to 3.14, a difference of 2.6%).
| Family Structure Metric | Immigrants from Northern Africa | Immigrants from Czechoslovakia |
| Family Households | Tragic 63.5% | Tragic 63.4% |
| Family Households with Children | Exceptional 27.8% | Tragic 26.2% |
| Married-couple Households | Fair 46.0% | Exceptional 47.8% |
| Average Family Size | Average 3.22 | Tragic 3.14 |
| Single Father Households | Exceptional 2.1% | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Single Mother Households | Good 6.2% | Exceptional 5.3% |
| Currently Married | Fair 46.5% | Exceptional 48.4% |
| Divorced or Separated | Exceptional 11.5% | Exceptional 11.7% |
| Births to Unmarried Women | Exceptional 29.5% | Exceptional 28.4% |
Immigrants from Northern Africa vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Northern Africa and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (12.6% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 7.0%), 3 or more vehicles in household (17.8% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 3.9%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (52.3% compared to 54.1%, a difference of 3.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (87.4% compared to 88.3%, a difference of 1.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.6% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 2.3%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (52.3% compared to 54.1%, a difference of 3.4%).
| Vehicle Availability Metric | Immigrants from Northern Africa | Immigrants from Czechoslovakia |
| No Vehicles Available | Tragic 12.6% | Tragic 11.8% |
| 1+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 87.4% | Tragic 88.3% |
| 2+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 52.3% | Tragic 54.1% |
| 3+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 17.8% | Tragic 18.5% |
| 4+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 5.6% | Tragic 5.8% |
Immigrants from Northern Africa vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Northern Africa and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.2% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 20.3%), professional degree (5.1% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 15.0%), and doctorate degree (2.1% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 11.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.8% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.41%), kindergarten (97.8% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.41%), and 1st grade (97.8% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.42%).
| Education Level Metric | Immigrants from Northern Africa | Immigrants from Czechoslovakia |
| No Schooling Completed | Poor 2.2% | Exceptional 1.8% |
| Nursery School | Poor 97.8% | Exceptional 98.2% |
| Kindergarten | Poor 97.8% | Exceptional 98.2% |
| 1st Grade | Poor 97.8% | Exceptional 98.2% |
| 2nd Grade | Poor 97.7% | Exceptional 98.1% |
| 3rd Grade | Poor 97.6% | Exceptional 98.0% |
| 4th Grade | Poor 97.4% | Exceptional 97.9% |
| 5th Grade | Poor 97.2% | Exceptional 97.7% |
| 6th Grade | Poor 96.9% | Exceptional 97.4% |
| 7th Grade | Fair 95.8% | Exceptional 96.6% |
| 8th Grade | Fair 95.5% | Exceptional 96.4% |
| 9th Grade | Fair 94.7% | Exceptional 95.7% |
| 10th Grade | Average 93.7% | Exceptional 94.7% |
| 11th Grade | Average 92.6% | Exceptional 93.8% |
| 12th Grade, No Diploma | Good 91.4% | Exceptional 92.7% |
| High School Diploma | Good 89.4% | Exceptional 90.9% |
| GED/Equivalency | Good 86.3% | Exceptional 87.9% |
| College, Under 1 year | Exceptional 67.2% | Exceptional 69.6% |
| College, 1 year or more | Exceptional 61.9% | Exceptional 64.1% |
| Associate's Degree | Exceptional 49.7% | Exceptional 51.9% |
| Bachelor's Degree | Exceptional 41.9% | Exceptional 44.0% |
| Master's Degree | Exceptional 17.1% | Exceptional 18.5% |
| Professional Degree | Exceptional 5.1% | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Doctorate Degree | Exceptional 2.1% | Exceptional 2.4% |
Immigrants from Northern Africa vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Northern Africa and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.8% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 13.0%), cognitive disability (17.3% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 6.6%), and disability age 65 to 74 (22.4% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 6.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 0.10%), self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 0.33%), and female disability (11.5% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 1.1%).
| Disability Metric | Immigrants from Northern Africa | Immigrants from Czechoslovakia |
| Disability | Exceptional 10.9% | Exceptional 11.2% |
| Males | Exceptional 10.4% | Excellent 10.9% |
| Females | Exceptional 11.5% | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Age | Under 5 years | Exceptional 1.2% | Excellent 1.2% |
| Age | 5 to 17 years | Exceptional 5.3% | Exceptional 5.2% |
| Age | 18 to 34 years | Exceptional 6.1% | Exceptional 6.3% |
| Age | 35 to 64 years | Exceptional 10.3% | Exceptional 10.0% |
| Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 22.4% | Exceptional 21.0% |
| Age | Over 75 years | Exceptional 46.7% | Exceptional 45.1% |
| Vision | Exceptional 2.0% | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Hearing | Exceptional 2.8% | Poor 3.1% |
| Cognitive | Average 17.3% | Exceptional 16.2% |
| Ambulatory | Exceptional 5.7% | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Self-Care | Exceptional 2.3% | Exceptional 2.4% |