Immigrants from Romania vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Community Comparison

COMPARE

Immigrants from Romania
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Immigrants from Romania

Immigrants from Czechoslovakia

Exceptional
Excellent
9,314
SOCIAL INDEX
90.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
21st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
8,836
SOCIAL INDEX
85.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
45th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Integration in Immigrants from Romania Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 145,423,968 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Czechoslovakia within Immigrant from Romania communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.553. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Romania within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.149% in Immigrants from Czechoslovakia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Romania corresponds to an increase of 149.4 Immigrants from Czechoslovakia.
Immigrants from Romania Integration in Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Communities

Immigrants from Romania vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Romania and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($49,463 compared to $51,770, a difference of 4.7%), householder income over 65 years ($64,462 compared to $66,376, a difference of 3.0%), and median family income ($113,434 compared to $116,165, a difference of 2.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.0% compared to 27.3%, a difference of 0.91%), median household income ($94,222 compared to $95,319, a difference of 1.2%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($110,633 compared to $111,914, a difference of 1.2%).
Immigrants from Romania vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Income
Income MetricImmigrants from RomaniaImmigrants from Czechoslovakia
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$49,463
Exceptional
$51,770
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$113,434
Exceptional
$116,165
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$94,222
Exceptional
$95,319
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$51,337
Exceptional
$52,361
Median Male Earnings
Exceptional
$61,040
Exceptional
$62,217
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$42,718
Exceptional
$43,571
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$55,522
Exceptional
$54,352
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$104,713
Exceptional
$106,888
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$110,633
Exceptional
$111,914
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$64,462
Exceptional
$66,376
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
27.0%
Tragic
27.3%

Immigrants from Romania vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Romania and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 18-24 year olds (18.0% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 6.2%), single father poverty (15.5% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 4.3%), and receiving food stamps (10.0% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 4.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of poverty (11.0% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 0.010%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.1% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 0.11%), and female poverty (12.0% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 0.64%).
Immigrants from Romania vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Poverty
Poverty MetricImmigrants from RomaniaImmigrants from Czechoslovakia
Poverty
Exceptional
11.0%
Exceptional
11.0%
Families
Exceptional
7.8%
Exceptional
7.7%
Males
Exceptional
9.9%
Exceptional
10.0%
Females
Exceptional
12.0%
Exceptional
11.9%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
18.0%
Exceptional
19.1%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
12.1%
Exceptional
12.1%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
15.2%
Exceptional
14.8%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.2%
Exceptional
13.9%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.5%
Exceptional
14.4%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.3%
Exceptional
14.2%
Single Males
Exceptional
11.7%
Exceptional
12.1%
Single Females
Exceptional
18.8%
Exceptional
19.0%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
15.5%
Good
16.2%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
27.2%
Exceptional
27.4%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.7%
Exceptional
4.6%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
10.3%
Exceptional
10.0%
Seniors Over 75 years
Good
11.9%
Excellent
11.7%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
10.0%
Exceptional
9.6%

Immigrants from Romania vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Romania and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.6% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 5.0%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.3% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 4.4%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.7% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 4.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.5% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 0.040%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.090%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.4% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 0.28%).
Immigrants from Romania vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Unemployment
Unemployment MetricImmigrants from RomaniaImmigrants from Czechoslovakia
Unemployment
Exceptional
5.0%
Exceptional
5.0%
Males
Exceptional
5.1%
Exceptional
5.1%
Females
Excellent
5.1%
Exceptional
5.0%
Youth < 25
Good
11.5%
Good
11.5%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Average
17.5%
Fair
17.8%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Good
10.2%
Average
10.3%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.3%
Good
6.6%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.2%
Excellent
5.3%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Excellent
4.5%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Excellent
4.4%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Excellent
4.7%
Fair
4.8%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.7%
Fair
4.9%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Good
5.3%
Good
5.3%
Seniors > 65
Good
5.1%
Good
5.1%
Seniors > 75
Excellent
8.5%
Exceptional
8.4%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
7.1%
Exceptional
7.0%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.6%
Fair
9.0%
Women w/ Children < 18
Excellent
5.3%
Excellent
5.2%

Immigrants from Romania vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Romania and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (65.5% compared to 64.8%, a difference of 1.1%), in labor force | age 16-19 (36.3% compared to 36.6%, a difference of 0.84%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.1% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 0.38%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.8% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.040%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.3% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 0.17%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.1% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 0.30%).
Immigrants from Romania vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricImmigrants from RomaniaImmigrants from Czechoslovakia
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Excellent
65.5%
Poor
64.8%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
80.2%
Excellent
79.9%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Fair
36.3%
Average
36.6%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Good
75.2%
Average
75.0%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
85.1%
Exceptional
85.4%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
85.1%
Exceptional
85.4%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
84.8%
Exceptional
84.8%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
83.3%
Exceptional
83.4%

Immigrants from Romania vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Romania and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in family households with children (27.4% compared to 26.2%, a difference of 4.3%), single mother households (5.5% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 3.6%), and births to unmarried women (27.9% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 1.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (48.4% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 0.12%), married-couple households (48.3% compared to 47.8%, a difference of 1.1%), and average family size (3.18 compared to 3.14, a difference of 1.2%).
Immigrants from Romania vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Family Structure
Family Structure MetricImmigrants from RomaniaImmigrants from Czechoslovakia
Family Households
Good
64.6%
Tragic
63.4%
Family Households with Children
Fair
27.4%
Tragic
26.2%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
48.3%
Exceptional
47.8%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.18
Tragic
3.14
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.1%
Exceptional
2.0%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.5%
Exceptional
5.3%
Currently Married
Exceptional
48.4%
Exceptional
48.4%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
11.5%
Exceptional
11.7%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
27.9%
Exceptional
28.4%

Immigrants from Romania vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Romania and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.0% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 4.4%), no vehicles in household (11.4% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 3.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.9% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 2.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.7% compared to 88.3%, a difference of 0.42%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.7% compared to 54.1%, a difference of 1.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.9% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 2.0%).
Immigrants from Romania vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricImmigrants from RomaniaImmigrants from Czechoslovakia
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
11.4%
Tragic
11.8%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
88.7%
Tragic
88.3%
2+ Vehicles Available
Fair
54.7%
Tragic
54.1%
3+ Vehicles Available
Poor
18.9%
Tragic
18.5%
4+ Vehicles Available
Poor
6.0%
Tragic
5.8%

Immigrants from Romania vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Romania and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.1% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 10.9%), professional degree (5.4% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 8.3%), and no schooling completed (1.9% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 5.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.1% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.11%), kindergarten (98.1% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.11%), and 1st grade (98.1% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.11%).
Immigrants from Romania vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Education Level
Education Level MetricImmigrants from RomaniaImmigrants from Czechoslovakia
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.9%
Exceptional
1.8%
Nursery School
Excellent
98.1%
Exceptional
98.2%
Kindergarten
Excellent
98.1%
Exceptional
98.2%
1st Grade
Excellent
98.1%
Exceptional
98.2%
2nd Grade
Excellent
98.0%
Exceptional
98.1%
3rd Grade
Excellent
97.9%
Exceptional
98.0%
4th Grade
Exceptional
97.7%
Exceptional
97.9%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.6%
Exceptional
97.7%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.3%
Exceptional
97.4%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.4%
Exceptional
96.6%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.2%
Exceptional
96.4%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.4%
Exceptional
95.7%
10th Grade
Exceptional
94.5%
Exceptional
94.7%
11th Grade
Exceptional
93.5%
Exceptional
93.8%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
92.3%
Exceptional
92.7%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
90.4%
Exceptional
90.9%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
87.5%
Exceptional
87.9%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
68.9%
Exceptional
69.6%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
63.3%
Exceptional
64.1%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
50.9%
Exceptional
51.9%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
42.9%
Exceptional
44.0%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
17.7%
Exceptional
18.5%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
5.4%
Exceptional
5.8%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.1%
Exceptional
2.4%

Immigrants from Romania vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Romania and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.0% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 3.8%), disability age 65 to 74 (21.5% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 2.4%), and self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 2.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female disability (11.6% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 0.010%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.070%), and ambulatory disability (5.8% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 0.17%).
Immigrants from Romania vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Disability
Disability MetricImmigrants from RomaniaImmigrants from Czechoslovakia
Disability
Exceptional
11.2%
Exceptional
11.2%
Males
Exceptional
10.7%
Excellent
10.9%
Females
Exceptional
11.6%
Exceptional
11.6%
Age | Under 5 years
Excellent
1.2%
Excellent
1.2%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
5.2%
Exceptional
5.2%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Exceptional
6.3%
Exceptional
6.3%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
10.0%
Exceptional
10.0%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
21.5%
Exceptional
21.0%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
46.0%
Exceptional
45.1%
Vision
Exceptional
2.0%
Exceptional
2.0%
Hearing
Average
3.0%
Poor
3.1%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.4%
Exceptional
16.2%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.8%
Exceptional
5.8%
Self-Care
Excellent
2.4%
Exceptional
2.4%