Tlingit-Haida vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 42,747,131 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Czechoslovakia within Tlingit-Haida communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.264. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Tlingit-Haida within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.014% in Immigrants from Czechoslovakia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Tlingit-Haida corresponds to a decrease of 13.6 Immigrants from Czechoslovakia.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Tlingit-Haida and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($43,516 compared to $51,770, a difference of 19.0%), median male earnings ($52,409 compared to $62,217, a difference of 18.7%), and median earnings ($45,468 compared to $52,361, a difference of 15.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($55,914 compared to $54,352, a difference of 2.9%), householder income over 65 years ($62,922 compared to $66,376, a difference of 5.5%), and median female earnings ($39,513 compared to $43,571, a difference of 10.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Tlingit-Haida and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (9.7% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 20.8%), receiving food stamps (11.6% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 20.2%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (8.3% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 20.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty among girls under 16 (14.7% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 3.6%), single male poverty (11.6% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 4.2%), and family poverty (8.0% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 4.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Tlingit-Haida and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (20.7% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 145.8%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (6.8% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 33.0%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (23.5% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 32.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.3% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 0.040%), female unemployment (4.9% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 1.7%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.4% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Tlingit-Haida and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.5% compared to 36.6%, a difference of 10.7%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.9% compared to 75.0%, a difference of 3.9%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (82.3% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 3.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (83.9% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 0.62%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.5% compared to 64.8%, a difference of 1.1%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.0% compared to 79.9%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Tlingit-Haida and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.7% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 31.5%), births to unmarried women (32.2% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 13.5%), and divorced or separated (13.2% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 12.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.16 compared to 3.14, a difference of 0.42%), family households with children (26.0% compared to 26.2%, a difference of 0.73%), and family households (61.6% compared to 63.4%, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Tlingit-Haida and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 18.4%), no vehicles in household (10.1% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 17.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.9% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 7.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.1% compared to 88.3%, a difference of 2.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.8% compared to 54.1%, a difference of 3.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.9% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 7.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Tlingit-Haida and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (4.0% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 45.9%), master's degree (12.8% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 44.5%), and doctorate degree (1.7% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 38.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 12th grade, no diploma (93.0% compared to 92.7%, a difference of 0.34%), nursery school (98.7% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.50%), and 1st grade (98.7% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.50%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Tlingit-Haida and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (4.8% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 55.6%), vision disability (2.9% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 41.5%), and disability age 35 to 64 (13.2% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 32.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 3.4%), cognitive disability (17.2% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 6.3%), and ambulatory disability (6.5% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 10.9%).