Ute vs Chickasaw No Vehicles in Household
COMPARE
Ute
Chickasaw
No Vehicles in Household
No Vehicles in Household Comparison
Ute
Chickasaw
11.6%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
3.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
237th/ 347
METRIC RANK
7.9%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
43rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Ute vs Chickasaw No Vehicles in Household Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 55,604,944 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Ute and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.109 and weighted average of 11.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,505,491 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.334 and weighted average of 7.9%, a difference of 47.6%.
No Vehicles in Household Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Ute | Chickasaw |
| Minimum | 1.3% | 1.3% |
| Maximum | 54.2% | 15.9% |
| Range | 52.9% | 14.6% |
| Mean | 10.0% | 6.1% |
| Median | 6.5% | 5.5% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.3% | 4.2% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 12.4% | 7.4% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 8.1% | 3.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 10.9% | 3.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 10.7% | 3.0% |
Similar Demographics by No Vehicles in Household
Demographics Similar to Ute by No Vehicles in Household
In terms of no vehicles in household, the demographic groups most similar to Ute are Russian (11.6%, a difference of 0.050%), Cree (11.6%, a difference of 0.24%), Taiwanese (11.7%, a difference of 0.51%), Immigrants (11.7%, a difference of 0.57%), and Eastern European (11.7%, a difference of 0.58%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | No Vehicles in Household |
| Immigrants | Norway | 5.1 /100 | #230 | Tragic 11.4% |
| Immigrants | Japan | 5.1 /100 | #231 | Tragic 11.4% |
| Immigrants | Turkey | 4.8 /100 | #232 | Tragic 11.5% |
| Houma | 4.7 /100 | #233 | Tragic 11.5% |
| Immigrants | Peru | 4.5 /100 | #234 | Tragic 11.5% |
| Kiowa | 4.0 /100 | #235 | Tragic 11.5% |
| Cree | 3.5 /100 | #236 | Tragic 11.6% |
| Ute | 3.3 /100 | #237 | Tragic 11.6% |
| Russians | 3.2 /100 | #238 | Tragic 11.6% |
| Taiwanese | 2.8 /100 | #239 | Tragic 11.7% |
| Immigrants | Immigrants | 2.7 /100 | #240 | Tragic 11.7% |
| Eastern Europeans | 2.7 /100 | #241 | Tragic 11.7% |
| Turks | 2.6 /100 | #242 | Tragic 11.7% |
| Cheyenne | 2.4 /100 | #243 | Tragic 11.7% |
| Immigrants | Portugal | 2.2 /100 | #244 | Tragic 11.7% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by No Vehicles in Household
In terms of no vehicles in household, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Swiss (7.9%, a difference of 0.080%), French Canadian (7.8%, a difference of 0.21%), Czechoslovakian (7.8%, a difference of 0.36%), Choctaw (7.9%, a difference of 0.36%), and Immigrants from Fiji (7.8%, a difference of 0.46%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | No Vehicles in Household |
| Iraqis | 99.9 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 7.7% |
| Basques | 99.9 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 7.8% |
| Creek | 99.9 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 7.8% |
| Immigrants | Fiji | 99.9 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 7.8% |
| Czechoslovakians | 99.9 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 7.8% |
| French Canadians | 99.9 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 7.8% |
| Swiss | 99.9 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 7.9% |
| Chickasaw | 99.9 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 7.9% |
| Choctaw | 99.9 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 7.9% |
| Immigrants | Nonimmigrants | 99.9 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 7.9% |
| Spanish | 99.9 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 7.9% |
| Northern Europeans | 99.9 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 7.9% |
| Afghans | 99.9 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 8.0% |
| Guamanians/Chamorros | 99.9 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 8.0% |
| Belgians | 99.9 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 8.0% |