Immigrants from Saudi Arabia vs Chickasaw No Vehicles in Household
COMPARE
Immigrants from Saudi Arabia
Chickasaw
No Vehicles in Household
No Vehicles in Household Comparison
Immigrants from Saudi Arabia
Chickasaw
10.3%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
58.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
167th/ 347
METRIC RANK
7.9%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
43rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Saudi Arabia vs Chickasaw No Vehicles in Household Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 164,171,346 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Saudi Arabia and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.089 and weighted average of 10.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,505,491 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.334 and weighted average of 7.9%, a difference of 30.8%.
No Vehicles in Household Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Saudi Arabia | Chickasaw |
Minimum | 1.9% | 1.3% |
Maximum | 24.0% | 15.9% |
Range | 22.0% | 14.6% |
Mean | 7.7% | 6.1% |
Median | 7.1% | 5.5% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.6% | 4.2% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 10.0% | 7.4% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.4% | 3.2% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.6% | 3.1% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.6% | 3.0% |
Similar Demographics by No Vehicles in Household
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Saudi Arabia by No Vehicles in Household
In terms of no vehicles in household, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Saudi Arabia are Immigrants from Costa Rica (10.3%, a difference of 0.24%), Indonesian (10.3%, a difference of 0.29%), Comanche (10.2%, a difference of 0.30%), South African (10.2%, a difference of 0.34%), and Lumbee (10.3%, a difference of 0.56%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | No Vehicles in Household |
Immigrants | Middle Africa | 65.7 /100 | #160 | Good 10.2% |
New Zealanders | 65.1 /100 | #161 | Good 10.2% |
Immigrants | Austria | 64.4 /100 | #162 | Good 10.2% |
Immigrants | Cambodia | 63.7 /100 | #163 | Good 10.2% |
South Africans | 61.1 /100 | #164 | Good 10.2% |
Comanche | 60.8 /100 | #165 | Good 10.2% |
Immigrants | Costa Rica | 60.5 /100 | #166 | Good 10.3% |
Immigrants | Saudi Arabia | 58.8 /100 | #167 | Average 10.3% |
Indonesians | 56.7 /100 | #168 | Average 10.3% |
Lumbee | 54.7 /100 | #169 | Average 10.3% |
Immigrants | Latin America | 53.2 /100 | #170 | Average 10.4% |
Hmong | 52.7 /100 | #171 | Average 10.4% |
Brazilians | 51.7 /100 | #172 | Average 10.4% |
Filipinos | 50.1 /100 | #173 | Average 10.4% |
Immigrants | Sudan | 50.0 /100 | #174 | Average 10.4% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by No Vehicles in Household
In terms of no vehicles in household, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Swiss (7.9%, a difference of 0.080%), French Canadian (7.8%, a difference of 0.21%), Czechoslovakian (7.8%, a difference of 0.36%), Choctaw (7.9%, a difference of 0.36%), and Immigrants from Fiji (7.8%, a difference of 0.46%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | No Vehicles in Household |
Iraqis | 99.9 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 7.7% |
Basques | 99.9 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 7.8% |
Creek | 99.9 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 7.8% |
Immigrants | Fiji | 99.9 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 7.8% |
Czechoslovakians | 99.9 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 7.8% |
French Canadians | 99.9 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 7.8% |
Swiss | 99.9 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 7.9% |
Chickasaw | 99.9 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 7.9% |
Choctaw | 99.9 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 7.9% |
Immigrants | Nonimmigrants | 99.9 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 7.9% |
Spanish | 99.9 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 7.9% |
Northern Europeans | 99.9 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 7.9% |
Afghans | 99.9 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 8.0% |
Guamanians/Chamorros | 99.9 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 8.0% |
Belgians | 99.9 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 8.0% |