Ecuadorian vs Chickasaw No Vehicles in Household
COMPARE
Ecuadorian
Chickasaw
No Vehicles in Household
No Vehicles in Household Comparison
Ecuadorians
Chickasaw
22.8%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
329th/ 347
METRIC RANK
7.9%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
43rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Ecuadorian vs Chickasaw No Vehicles in Household Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 317,233,310 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Ecuadorians and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.074 and weighted average of 22.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,505,491 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.334 and weighted average of 7.9%, a difference of 189.5%.
No Vehicles in Household Correlation Summary
Measurement | Ecuadorian | Chickasaw |
Minimum | 2.1% | 1.3% |
Maximum | 56.4% | 15.9% |
Range | 54.3% | 14.6% |
Mean | 20.3% | 6.1% |
Median | 17.3% | 5.5% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 9.8% | 4.2% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 28.3% | 7.4% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 18.5% | 3.2% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 12.7% | 3.1% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 12.5% | 3.0% |
Similar Demographics by No Vehicles in Household
Demographics Similar to Ecuadorians by No Vehicles in Household
In terms of no vehicles in household, the demographic groups most similar to Ecuadorians are Immigrants from Dominica (22.2%, a difference of 2.3%), West Indian (23.7%, a difference of 4.2%), Trinidadian and Tobagonian (23.7%, a difference of 4.4%), Immigrants from Ecuador (23.8%, a difference of 4.7%), and Immigrants from Senegal (21.1%, a difference of 7.6%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | No Vehicles in Household |
Immigrants | Cabo Verde | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 18.4% |
Immigrants | Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 19.5% |
Immigrants | Caribbean | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 19.6% |
Senegalese | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 19.8% |
Immigrants | West Indies | 0.0 /100 | #326 | Tragic 20.5% |
Immigrants | Senegal | 0.0 /100 | #327 | Tragic 21.1% |
Immigrants | Dominica | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 22.2% |
Ecuadorians | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 22.8% |
West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 23.7% |
Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 23.7% |
Immigrants | Ecuador | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 23.8% |
Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 24.6% |
Immigrants | Bangladesh | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 25.8% |
Barbadians | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 26.1% |
Vietnamese | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 26.2% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by No Vehicles in Household
In terms of no vehicles in household, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Swiss (7.9%, a difference of 0.080%), French Canadian (7.8%, a difference of 0.21%), Czechoslovakian (7.8%, a difference of 0.36%), Choctaw (7.9%, a difference of 0.36%), and Immigrants from Fiji (7.8%, a difference of 0.46%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | No Vehicles in Household |
Iraqis | 99.9 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 7.7% |
Basques | 99.9 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 7.8% |
Creek | 99.9 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 7.8% |
Immigrants | Fiji | 99.9 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 7.8% |
Czechoslovakians | 99.9 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 7.8% |
French Canadians | 99.9 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 7.8% |
Swiss | 99.9 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 7.9% |
Chickasaw | 99.9 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 7.9% |
Choctaw | 99.9 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 7.9% |
Immigrants | Nonimmigrants | 99.9 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 7.9% |
Spanish | 99.9 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 7.9% |
Northern Europeans | 99.9 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 7.9% |
Afghans | 99.9 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 8.0% |
Guamanians/Chamorros | 99.9 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 8.0% |
Belgians | 99.9 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 8.0% |