Immigrants from India vs Chickasaw No Vehicles in Household
COMPARE
Immigrants from India
Chickasaw
No Vehicles in Household
No Vehicles in Household Comparison
Immigrants from India
Chickasaw
8.2%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
99.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
59th/ 347
METRIC RANK
7.9%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
43rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from India vs Chickasaw No Vehicles in Household Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 432,669,586 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from India and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.131 and weighted average of 8.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,505,491 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.334 and weighted average of 7.9%, a difference of 3.9%.
No Vehicles in Household Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from India | Chickasaw |
| Minimum | 0.34% | 1.3% |
| Maximum | 23.1% | 15.9% |
| Range | 22.8% | 14.6% |
| Mean | 6.4% | 6.1% |
| Median | 5.3% | 5.5% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.0% | 4.2% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 7.5% | 7.4% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.5% | 3.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.1% | 3.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.1% | 3.0% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from India and Chickasaw by No Vehicles in Household
In terms of no vehicles in household, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from India are Immigrants from Laos (8.2%, a difference of 0.070%), Thai (8.2%, a difference of 0.24%), Immigrants from Mexico (8.1%, a difference of 0.35%), Venezuelan (8.1%, a difference of 0.46%), and Immigrants from Afghanistan (8.1%, a difference of 0.74%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Swiss (7.9%, a difference of 0.080%), French Canadian (7.8%, a difference of 0.21%), Choctaw (7.9%, a difference of 0.36%), Nonimmigrants (7.9%, a difference of 0.53%), and Spanish (7.9%, a difference of 0.79%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | No Vehicles in Household |
| French Canadians | 99.9 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 7.8% |
| Swiss | 99.9 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 7.9% |
| Chickasaw | 99.9 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 7.9% |
| Choctaw | 99.9 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 7.9% |
| Immigrants | Nonimmigrants | 99.9 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 7.9% |
| Spanish | 99.9 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 7.9% |
| Northern Europeans | 99.9 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 7.9% |
| Afghans | 99.9 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 8.0% |
| Guamanians/Chamorros | 99.9 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 8.0% |
| Belgians | 99.9 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 8.0% |
| Koreans | 99.9 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 8.0% |
| Hawaiians | 99.9 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 8.0% |
| Slovenes | 99.9 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 8.0% |
| Immigrants | Venezuela | 99.9 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 8.1% |
| Celtics | 99.9 /100 | #55 | Exceptional 8.1% |
| Immigrants | Afghanistan | 99.9 /100 | #56 | Exceptional 8.1% |
| Venezuelans | 99.8 /100 | #57 | Exceptional 8.1% |
| Immigrants | Mexico | 99.8 /100 | #58 | Exceptional 8.1% |
| Immigrants | India | 99.8 /100 | #59 | Exceptional 8.2% |
| Immigrants | Laos | 99.8 /100 | #60 | Exceptional 8.2% |
| Thais | 99.8 /100 | #61 | Exceptional 8.2% |