Syrian vs Chickasaw No Vehicles in Household
COMPARE
Syrian
Chickasaw
No Vehicles in Household
No Vehicles in Household Comparison
Syrians
Chickasaw
9.7%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
87.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
134th/ 347
METRIC RANK
7.9%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
43rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Syrian vs Chickasaw No Vehicles in Household Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 265,903,344 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Syrians and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.369 and weighted average of 9.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,505,491 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.334 and weighted average of 7.9%, a difference of 23.9%.
No Vehicles in Household Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Syrian | Chickasaw |
| Minimum | 0.29% | 1.3% |
| Maximum | 23.8% | 15.9% |
| Range | 23.5% | 14.6% |
| Mean | 6.4% | 6.1% |
| Median | 6.1% | 5.5% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.6% | 4.2% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 8.0% | 7.4% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.4% | 3.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.2% | 3.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.1% | 3.0% |
Similar Demographics by No Vehicles in Household
Demographics Similar to Syrians by No Vehicles in Household
In terms of no vehicles in household, the demographic groups most similar to Syrians are Immigrants from Oceania (9.7%, a difference of 0.020%), Kenyan (9.7%, a difference of 0.32%), Immigrants from the Azores (9.7%, a difference of 0.39%), Latvian (9.8%, a difference of 0.58%), and Burmese (9.7%, a difference of 0.60%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | No Vehicles in Household |
| Immigrants | Kenya | 89.7 /100 | #127 | Excellent 9.6% |
| Immigrants | Syria | 89.5 /100 | #128 | Excellent 9.6% |
| Nicaraguans | 89.5 /100 | #129 | Excellent 9.7% |
| Burmese | 88.8 /100 | #130 | Excellent 9.7% |
| Immigrants | Azores | 88.2 /100 | #131 | Excellent 9.7% |
| Kenyans | 88.0 /100 | #132 | Excellent 9.7% |
| Immigrants | Oceania | 87.1 /100 | #133 | Excellent 9.7% |
| Syrians | 87.1 /100 | #134 | Excellent 9.7% |
| Latvians | 85.1 /100 | #135 | Excellent 9.8% |
| Immigrants | South Africa | 85.0 /100 | #136 | Excellent 9.8% |
| Immigrants | Moldova | 84.6 /100 | #137 | Excellent 9.8% |
| Estonians | 84.2 /100 | #138 | Excellent 9.8% |
| Marshallese | 84.0 /100 | #139 | Excellent 9.8% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 84.0 /100 | #140 | Excellent 9.8% |
| Sudanese | 83.1 /100 | #141 | Excellent 9.8% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by No Vehicles in Household
In terms of no vehicles in household, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Swiss (7.9%, a difference of 0.080%), French Canadian (7.8%, a difference of 0.21%), Czechoslovakian (7.8%, a difference of 0.36%), Choctaw (7.9%, a difference of 0.36%), and Immigrants from Fiji (7.8%, a difference of 0.46%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | No Vehicles in Household |
| Iraqis | 99.9 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 7.7% |
| Basques | 99.9 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 7.8% |
| Creek | 99.9 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 7.8% |
| Immigrants | Fiji | 99.9 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 7.8% |
| Czechoslovakians | 99.9 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 7.8% |
| French Canadians | 99.9 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 7.8% |
| Swiss | 99.9 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 7.9% |
| Chickasaw | 99.9 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 7.9% |
| Choctaw | 99.9 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 7.9% |
| Immigrants | Nonimmigrants | 99.9 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 7.9% |
| Spanish | 99.9 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 7.9% |
| Northern Europeans | 99.9 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 7.9% |
| Afghans | 99.9 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 8.0% |
| Guamanians/Chamorros | 99.9 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 8.0% |
| Belgians | 99.9 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 8.0% |