Croatian vs Chickasaw No Vehicles in Household
COMPARE
Croatian
Chickasaw
No Vehicles in Household
No Vehicles in Household Comparison
Croatians
Chickasaw
8.3%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
99.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
64th/ 347
METRIC RANK
7.9%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
43rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Croatian vs Chickasaw No Vehicles in Household Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 374,727,415 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Croatians and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.015 and weighted average of 8.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,505,491 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.334 and weighted average of 7.9%, a difference of 5.1%.
No Vehicles in Household Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Croatian | Chickasaw |
| Minimum | 0.79% | 1.3% |
| Maximum | 21.0% | 15.9% |
| Range | 20.2% | 14.6% |
| Mean | 7.5% | 6.1% |
| Median | 6.8% | 5.5% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.8% | 4.2% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 9.4% | 7.4% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.7% | 3.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.3% | 3.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.3% | 3.0% |
Similar Demographics by No Vehicles in Household
Demographics Similar to Croatians by No Vehicles in Household
In terms of no vehicles in household, the demographic groups most similar to Croatians are Slovak (8.3%, a difference of 0.090%), Chinese (8.2%, a difference of 0.47%), Canadian (8.3%, a difference of 0.75%), Palestinian (8.3%, a difference of 0.86%), and Immigrants from Scotland (8.3%, a difference of 0.87%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | No Vehicles in Household |
| Venezuelans | 99.8 /100 | #57 | Exceptional 8.1% |
| Immigrants | Mexico | 99.8 /100 | #58 | Exceptional 8.1% |
| Immigrants | India | 99.8 /100 | #59 | Exceptional 8.2% |
| Immigrants | Laos | 99.8 /100 | #60 | Exceptional 8.2% |
| Thais | 99.8 /100 | #61 | Exceptional 8.2% |
| Chinese | 99.8 /100 | #62 | Exceptional 8.2% |
| Slovaks | 99.8 /100 | #63 | Exceptional 8.3% |
| Croatians | 99.8 /100 | #64 | Exceptional 8.3% |
| Canadians | 99.7 /100 | #65 | Exceptional 8.3% |
| Palestinians | 99.7 /100 | #66 | Exceptional 8.3% |
| Immigrants | Scotland | 99.7 /100 | #67 | Exceptional 8.3% |
| Immigrants | Iran | 99.7 /100 | #68 | Exceptional 8.4% |
| Spaniards | 99.7 /100 | #69 | Exceptional 8.4% |
| Cajuns | 99.6 /100 | #70 | Exceptional 8.4% |
| Immigrants | Lebanon | 99.6 /100 | #71 | Exceptional 8.4% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by No Vehicles in Household
In terms of no vehicles in household, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Swiss (7.9%, a difference of 0.080%), French Canadian (7.8%, a difference of 0.21%), Czechoslovakian (7.8%, a difference of 0.36%), Choctaw (7.9%, a difference of 0.36%), and Immigrants from Fiji (7.8%, a difference of 0.46%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | No Vehicles in Household |
| Iraqis | 99.9 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 7.7% |
| Basques | 99.9 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 7.8% |
| Creek | 99.9 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 7.8% |
| Immigrants | Fiji | 99.9 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 7.8% |
| Czechoslovakians | 99.9 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 7.8% |
| French Canadians | 99.9 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 7.8% |
| Swiss | 99.9 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 7.9% |
| Chickasaw | 99.9 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 7.9% |
| Choctaw | 99.9 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 7.9% |
| Immigrants | Nonimmigrants | 99.9 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 7.9% |
| Spanish | 99.9 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 7.9% |
| Northern Europeans | 99.9 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 7.9% |
| Afghans | 99.9 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 8.0% |
| Guamanians/Chamorros | 99.9 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 8.0% |
| Belgians | 99.9 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 8.0% |