Uruguayan vs Chickasaw No Vehicles in Household
COMPARE
Uruguayan
Chickasaw
No Vehicles in Household
No Vehicles in Household Comparison
Uruguayans
Chickasaw
11.3%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
7.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
223rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
7.9%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
43rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Uruguayan vs Chickasaw No Vehicles in Household Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 144,673,371 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Uruguayans and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.318 and weighted average of 11.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,505,491 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.334 and weighted average of 7.9%, a difference of 43.5%.
No Vehicles in Household Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Uruguayan | Chickasaw |
| Minimum | 0.52% | 1.3% |
| Maximum | 16.9% | 15.9% |
| Range | 16.4% | 14.6% |
| Mean | 7.7% | 6.1% |
| Median | 7.1% | 5.5% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.6% | 4.2% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 9.9% | 7.4% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.3% | 3.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.2% | 3.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.2% | 3.0% |
Similar Demographics by No Vehicles in Household
Demographics Similar to Uruguayans by No Vehicles in Household
In terms of no vehicles in household, the demographic groups most similar to Uruguayans are Immigrants from South America (11.3%, a difference of 0.16%), Immigrants from Hong Kong (11.3%, a difference of 0.22%), Peruvian (11.2%, a difference of 0.30%), Immigrants from Sierra Leone (11.3%, a difference of 0.59%), and Immigrants from Zaire (11.2%, a difference of 0.75%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | No Vehicles in Household |
| Immigrants | Argentina | 10.6 /100 | #216 | Poor 11.2% |
| Dutch West Indians | 10.2 /100 | #217 | Poor 11.2% |
| Immigrants | Guatemala | 10.0 /100 | #218 | Tragic 11.2% |
| Argentineans | 9.6 /100 | #219 | Tragic 11.2% |
| Immigrants | Zaire | 9.6 /100 | #220 | Tragic 11.2% |
| Peruvians | 8.4 /100 | #221 | Tragic 11.2% |
| Immigrants | South America | 8.0 /100 | #222 | Tragic 11.3% |
| Uruguayans | 7.7 /100 | #223 | Tragic 11.3% |
| Immigrants | Hong Kong | 7.2 /100 | #224 | Tragic 11.3% |
| Immigrants | Sierra Leone | 6.4 /100 | #225 | Tragic 11.3% |
| Immigrants | Somalia | 5.4 /100 | #226 | Tragic 11.4% |
| Immigrants | Pakistan | 5.4 /100 | #227 | Tragic 11.4% |
| Immigrants | Romania | 5.3 /100 | #228 | Tragic 11.4% |
| Ugandans | 5.3 /100 | #229 | Tragic 11.4% |
| Immigrants | Norway | 5.1 /100 | #230 | Tragic 11.4% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by No Vehicles in Household
In terms of no vehicles in household, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Swiss (7.9%, a difference of 0.080%), French Canadian (7.8%, a difference of 0.21%), Czechoslovakian (7.8%, a difference of 0.36%), Choctaw (7.9%, a difference of 0.36%), and Immigrants from Fiji (7.8%, a difference of 0.46%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | No Vehicles in Household |
| Iraqis | 99.9 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 7.7% |
| Basques | 99.9 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 7.8% |
| Creek | 99.9 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 7.8% |
| Immigrants | Fiji | 99.9 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 7.8% |
| Czechoslovakians | 99.9 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 7.8% |
| French Canadians | 99.9 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 7.8% |
| Swiss | 99.9 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 7.9% |
| Chickasaw | 99.9 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 7.9% |
| Choctaw | 99.9 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 7.9% |
| Immigrants | Nonimmigrants | 99.9 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 7.9% |
| Spanish | 99.9 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 7.9% |
| Northern Europeans | 99.9 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 7.9% |
| Afghans | 99.9 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 8.0% |
| Guamanians/Chamorros | 99.9 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 8.0% |
| Belgians | 99.9 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 8.0% |