Comanche vs Chickasaw No Vehicles in Household
COMPARE
Comanche
Chickasaw
No Vehicles in Household
No Vehicles in Household Comparison
Comanche
Chickasaw
10.2%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
60.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
165th/ 347
METRIC RANK
7.9%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
43rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Comanche vs Chickasaw No Vehicles in Household Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 109,677,271 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Comanche and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.146 and weighted average of 10.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,505,491 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.334 and weighted average of 7.9%, a difference of 30.4%.
No Vehicles in Household Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Comanche | Chickasaw |
| Minimum | 1.3% | 1.3% |
| Maximum | 15.8% | 15.9% |
| Range | 14.5% | 14.6% |
| Mean | 7.1% | 6.1% |
| Median | 5.6% | 5.5% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.0% | 4.2% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 11.0% | 7.4% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.0% | 3.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.2% | 3.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.1% | 3.0% |
Similar Demographics by No Vehicles in Household
Demographics Similar to Comanche by No Vehicles in Household
In terms of no vehicles in household, the demographic groups most similar to Comanche are South African (10.2%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Costa Rica (10.3%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Saudi Arabia (10.3%, a difference of 0.30%), Immigrants from Cambodia (10.2%, a difference of 0.42%), and Immigrants from Austria (10.2%, a difference of 0.52%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | No Vehicles in Household |
| Spanish American Indians | 70.2 /100 | #158 | Good 10.1% |
| Immigrants | Indonesia | 69.3 /100 | #159 | Good 10.1% |
| Immigrants | Middle Africa | 65.7 /100 | #160 | Good 10.2% |
| New Zealanders | 65.1 /100 | #161 | Good 10.2% |
| Immigrants | Austria | 64.4 /100 | #162 | Good 10.2% |
| Immigrants | Cambodia | 63.7 /100 | #163 | Good 10.2% |
| South Africans | 61.1 /100 | #164 | Good 10.2% |
| Comanche | 60.8 /100 | #165 | Good 10.2% |
| Immigrants | Costa Rica | 60.5 /100 | #166 | Good 10.3% |
| Immigrants | Saudi Arabia | 58.8 /100 | #167 | Average 10.3% |
| Indonesians | 56.7 /100 | #168 | Average 10.3% |
| Lumbee | 54.7 /100 | #169 | Average 10.3% |
| Immigrants | Latin America | 53.2 /100 | #170 | Average 10.4% |
| Hmong | 52.7 /100 | #171 | Average 10.4% |
| Brazilians | 51.7 /100 | #172 | Average 10.4% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by No Vehicles in Household
In terms of no vehicles in household, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Swiss (7.9%, a difference of 0.080%), French Canadian (7.8%, a difference of 0.21%), Czechoslovakian (7.8%, a difference of 0.36%), Choctaw (7.9%, a difference of 0.36%), and Immigrants from Fiji (7.8%, a difference of 0.46%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | No Vehicles in Household |
| Iraqis | 99.9 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 7.7% |
| Basques | 99.9 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 7.8% |
| Creek | 99.9 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 7.8% |
| Immigrants | Fiji | 99.9 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 7.8% |
| Czechoslovakians | 99.9 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 7.8% |
| French Canadians | 99.9 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 7.8% |
| Swiss | 99.9 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 7.9% |
| Chickasaw | 99.9 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 7.9% |
| Choctaw | 99.9 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 7.9% |
| Immigrants | Nonimmigrants | 99.9 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 7.9% |
| Spanish | 99.9 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 7.9% |
| Northern Europeans | 99.9 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 7.9% |
| Afghans | 99.9 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 8.0% |
| Guamanians/Chamorros | 99.9 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 8.0% |
| Belgians | 99.9 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 8.0% |