Immigrants from Africa vs Chickasaw No Vehicles in Household
COMPARE
Immigrants from Africa
Chickasaw
No Vehicles in Household
No Vehicles in Household Comparison
Immigrants from Africa
Chickasaw
12.5%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
0.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
268th/ 347
METRIC RANK
7.9%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
43rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Africa vs Chickasaw No Vehicles in Household Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 467,696,896 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Africa and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.110 and weighted average of 12.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,505,491 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.334 and weighted average of 7.9%, a difference of 59.3%.

No Vehicles in Household Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Africa | Chickasaw |
Minimum | 1.9% | 1.3% |
Maximum | 39.1% | 15.9% |
Range | 37.2% | 14.6% |
Mean | 13.7% | 6.1% |
Median | 12.0% | 5.5% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 9.7% | 4.2% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 15.7% | 7.4% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.0% | 3.2% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.0% | 3.1% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 7.0% | 3.0% |
Similar Demographics by No Vehicles in Household
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Africa by No Vehicles in Household
In terms of no vehicles in household, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Africa are Immigrants from Europe (12.5%, a difference of 0.050%), Panamanian (12.5%, a difference of 0.13%), Israeli (12.4%, a difference of 0.63%), Immigrants from Northern Africa (12.6%, a difference of 0.68%), and Immigrants from Morocco (12.6%, a difference of 0.80%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | No Vehicles in Household |
Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.6 /100 | #261 | Tragic 12.2% |
Immigrants | Liberia | 0.6 /100 | #262 | Tragic 12.2% |
Immigrants | Egypt | 0.6 /100 | #263 | Tragic 12.2% |
Immigrants | Switzerland | 0.5 /100 | #264 | Tragic 12.3% |
Africans | 0.4 /100 | #265 | Tragic 12.3% |
Israelis | 0.3 /100 | #266 | Tragic 12.4% |
Immigrants | Europe | 0.3 /100 | #267 | Tragic 12.5% |
Immigrants | Africa | 0.2 /100 | #268 | Tragic 12.5% |
Panamanians | 0.2 /100 | #269 | Tragic 12.5% |
Immigrants | Northern Africa | 0.2 /100 | #270 | Tragic 12.6% |
Immigrants | Morocco | 0.2 /100 | #271 | Tragic 12.6% |
Bermudans | 0.1 /100 | #272 | Tragic 12.8% |
Immigrants | France | 0.1 /100 | #273 | Tragic 12.9% |
Immigrants | Singapore | 0.1 /100 | #274 | Tragic 12.9% |
Immigrants | Albania | 0.1 /100 | #275 | Tragic 13.0% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by No Vehicles in Household
In terms of no vehicles in household, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Swiss (7.9%, a difference of 0.080%), French Canadian (7.8%, a difference of 0.21%), Czechoslovakian (7.8%, a difference of 0.36%), Choctaw (7.9%, a difference of 0.36%), and Immigrants from Fiji (7.8%, a difference of 0.46%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | No Vehicles in Household |
Iraqis | 99.9 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 7.7% |
Basques | 99.9 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 7.8% |
Creek | 99.9 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 7.8% |
Immigrants | Fiji | 99.9 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 7.8% |
Czechoslovakians | 99.9 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 7.8% |
French Canadians | 99.9 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 7.8% |
Swiss | 99.9 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 7.9% |
Chickasaw | 99.9 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 7.9% |
Choctaw | 99.9 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 7.9% |
Immigrants | Nonimmigrants | 99.9 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 7.9% |
Spanish | 99.9 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 7.9% |
Northern Europeans | 99.9 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 7.9% |
Afghans | 99.9 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 8.0% |
Guamanians/Chamorros | 99.9 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 8.0% |
Belgians | 99.9 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 8.0% |