Cuban vs Chickasaw No Vehicles in Household
COMPARE
Cuban
Chickasaw
No Vehicles in Household
No Vehicles in Household Comparison
Cubans
Chickasaw
8.5%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
99.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
74th/ 347
METRIC RANK
7.9%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
43rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Cuban vs Chickasaw No Vehicles in Household Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 447,809,570 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Cubans and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.165 and weighted average of 8.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,505,491 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.334 and weighted average of 7.9%, a difference of 8.3%.
No Vehicles in Household Correlation Summary
Measurement | Cuban | Chickasaw |
Minimum | 0.80% | 1.3% |
Maximum | 20.7% | 15.9% |
Range | 19.9% | 14.6% |
Mean | 7.7% | 6.1% |
Median | 6.8% | 5.5% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.0% | 4.2% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 8.8% | 7.4% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.8% | 3.2% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.3% | 3.1% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.2% | 3.0% |
Similar Demographics by No Vehicles in Household
Demographics Similar to Cubans by No Vehicles in Household
In terms of no vehicles in household, the demographic groups most similar to Cubans are Jordanian (8.5%, a difference of 0.22%), Immigrants from Philippines (8.5%, a difference of 0.46%), Iranian (8.6%, a difference of 0.55%), Immigrants from South Central Asia (8.6%, a difference of 0.67%), and Portuguese (8.6%, a difference of 0.73%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | No Vehicles in Household |
Immigrants | Scotland | 99.7 /100 | #67 | Exceptional 8.3% |
Immigrants | Iran | 99.7 /100 | #68 | Exceptional 8.4% |
Spaniards | 99.7 /100 | #69 | Exceptional 8.4% |
Cajuns | 99.6 /100 | #70 | Exceptional 8.4% |
Immigrants | Lebanon | 99.6 /100 | #71 | Exceptional 8.4% |
Lithuanians | 99.6 /100 | #72 | Exceptional 8.4% |
Poles | 99.6 /100 | #73 | Exceptional 8.4% |
Cubans | 99.5 /100 | #74 | Exceptional 8.5% |
Jordanians | 99.5 /100 | #75 | Exceptional 8.5% |
Immigrants | Philippines | 99.5 /100 | #76 | Exceptional 8.5% |
Iranians | 99.5 /100 | #77 | Exceptional 8.6% |
Immigrants | South Central Asia | 99.5 /100 | #78 | Exceptional 8.6% |
Portuguese | 99.5 /100 | #79 | Exceptional 8.6% |
Bolivians | 99.4 /100 | #80 | Exceptional 8.6% |
Tsimshian | 99.4 /100 | #81 | Exceptional 8.6% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by No Vehicles in Household
In terms of no vehicles in household, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Swiss (7.9%, a difference of 0.080%), French Canadian (7.8%, a difference of 0.21%), Czechoslovakian (7.8%, a difference of 0.36%), Choctaw (7.9%, a difference of 0.36%), and Immigrants from Fiji (7.8%, a difference of 0.46%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | No Vehicles in Household |
Iraqis | 99.9 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 7.7% |
Basques | 99.9 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 7.8% |
Creek | 99.9 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 7.8% |
Immigrants | Fiji | 99.9 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 7.8% |
Czechoslovakians | 99.9 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 7.8% |
French Canadians | 99.9 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 7.8% |
Swiss | 99.9 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 7.9% |
Chickasaw | 99.9 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 7.9% |
Choctaw | 99.9 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 7.9% |
Immigrants | Nonimmigrants | 99.9 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 7.9% |
Spanish | 99.9 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 7.9% |
Northern Europeans | 99.9 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 7.9% |
Afghans | 99.9 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 8.0% |
Guamanians/Chamorros | 99.9 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 8.0% |
Belgians | 99.9 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 8.0% |