Turkish vs Chickasaw No Vehicles in Household
COMPARE
Turkish
Chickasaw
No Vehicles in Household
No Vehicles in Household Comparison
Turks
Chickasaw
11.7%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
2.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
242nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
7.9%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
43rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Turkish vs Chickasaw No Vehicles in Household Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 271,510,878 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Turks and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.061 and weighted average of 11.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,505,491 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.334 and weighted average of 7.9%, a difference of 48.6%.
No Vehicles in Household Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Turkish | Chickasaw |
| Minimum | 0.69% | 1.3% |
| Maximum | 21.1% | 15.9% |
| Range | 20.4% | 14.6% |
| Mean | 8.0% | 6.1% |
| Median | 7.1% | 5.5% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.9% | 4.2% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 10.1% | 7.4% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.2% | 3.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.8% | 3.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.8% | 3.0% |
Similar Demographics by No Vehicles in Household
Demographics Similar to Turks by No Vehicles in Household
In terms of no vehicles in household, the demographic groups most similar to Turks are Eastern European (11.7%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants (11.7%, a difference of 0.12%), Taiwanese (11.7%, a difference of 0.18%), Cheyenne (11.7%, a difference of 0.33%), and Immigrants from Portugal (11.7%, a difference of 0.51%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | No Vehicles in Household |
| Kiowa | 4.0 /100 | #235 | Tragic 11.5% |
| Cree | 3.5 /100 | #236 | Tragic 11.6% |
| Ute | 3.3 /100 | #237 | Tragic 11.6% |
| Russians | 3.2 /100 | #238 | Tragic 11.6% |
| Taiwanese | 2.8 /100 | #239 | Tragic 11.7% |
| Immigrants | Immigrants | 2.7 /100 | #240 | Tragic 11.7% |
| Eastern Europeans | 2.7 /100 | #241 | Tragic 11.7% |
| Turks | 2.6 /100 | #242 | Tragic 11.7% |
| Cheyenne | 2.4 /100 | #243 | Tragic 11.7% |
| Immigrants | Portugal | 2.2 /100 | #244 | Tragic 11.7% |
| Immigrants | Honduras | 2.1 /100 | #245 | Tragic 11.8% |
| Menominee | 2.0 /100 | #246 | Tragic 11.8% |
| Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 2.0 /100 | #247 | Tragic 11.8% |
| Immigrants | Belgium | 1.9 /100 | #248 | Tragic 11.8% |
| Immigrants | Nigeria | 1.9 /100 | #249 | Tragic 11.8% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by No Vehicles in Household
In terms of no vehicles in household, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Swiss (7.9%, a difference of 0.080%), French Canadian (7.8%, a difference of 0.21%), Czechoslovakian (7.8%, a difference of 0.36%), Choctaw (7.9%, a difference of 0.36%), and Immigrants from Fiji (7.8%, a difference of 0.46%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | No Vehicles in Household |
| Iraqis | 99.9 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 7.7% |
| Basques | 99.9 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 7.8% |
| Creek | 99.9 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 7.8% |
| Immigrants | Fiji | 99.9 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 7.8% |
| Czechoslovakians | 99.9 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 7.8% |
| French Canadians | 99.9 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 7.8% |
| Swiss | 99.9 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 7.9% |
| Chickasaw | 99.9 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 7.9% |
| Choctaw | 99.9 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 7.9% |
| Immigrants | Nonimmigrants | 99.9 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 7.9% |
| Spanish | 99.9 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 7.9% |
| Northern Europeans | 99.9 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 7.9% |
| Afghans | 99.9 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 8.0% |
| Guamanians/Chamorros | 99.9 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 8.0% |
| Belgians | 99.9 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 8.0% |