South American Indian vs Chickasaw No Vehicles in Household
COMPARE
South American Indian
Chickasaw
No Vehicles in Household
No Vehicles in Household Comparison
South American Indians
Chickasaw
12.1%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
0.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
258th/ 347
METRIC RANK
7.9%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
43rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
South American Indian vs Chickasaw No Vehicles in Household Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 164,483,116 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of South American Indians and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.193 and weighted average of 12.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,505,491 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.334 and weighted average of 7.9%, a difference of 53.5%.
No Vehicles in Household Correlation Summary
Measurement | South American Indian | Chickasaw |
Minimum | 0.72% | 1.3% |
Maximum | 38.9% | 15.9% |
Range | 38.2% | 14.6% |
Mean | 8.5% | 6.1% |
Median | 6.9% | 5.5% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.7% | 4.2% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 11.5% | 7.4% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.9% | 3.2% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.0% | 3.1% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.9% | 3.0% |
Similar Demographics by No Vehicles in Household
Demographics Similar to South American Indians by No Vehicles in Household
In terms of no vehicles in household, the demographic groups most similar to South American Indians are Nigerian (12.1%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Latvia (12.1%, a difference of 0.24%), Liberian (12.0%, a difference of 0.76%), Macedonian (12.2%, a difference of 0.80%), and Honduran (12.0%, a difference of 0.81%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | No Vehicles in Household |
Blacks/African Americans | 1.6 /100 | #251 | Tragic 11.9% |
Immigrants | Serbia | 1.5 /100 | #252 | Tragic 11.9% |
Egyptians | 1.4 /100 | #253 | Tragic 11.9% |
Immigrants | Uruguay | 1.3 /100 | #254 | Tragic 11.9% |
Hondurans | 1.2 /100 | #255 | Tragic 12.0% |
Liberians | 1.2 /100 | #256 | Tragic 12.0% |
Nigerians | 0.9 /100 | #257 | Tragic 12.1% |
South American Indians | 0.9 /100 | #258 | Tragic 12.1% |
Immigrants | Latvia | 0.8 /100 | #259 | Tragic 12.1% |
Macedonians | 0.7 /100 | #260 | Tragic 12.2% |
Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.6 /100 | #261 | Tragic 12.2% |
Immigrants | Liberia | 0.6 /100 | #262 | Tragic 12.2% |
Immigrants | Egypt | 0.6 /100 | #263 | Tragic 12.2% |
Immigrants | Switzerland | 0.5 /100 | #264 | Tragic 12.3% |
Africans | 0.4 /100 | #265 | Tragic 12.3% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by No Vehicles in Household
In terms of no vehicles in household, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Swiss (7.9%, a difference of 0.080%), French Canadian (7.8%, a difference of 0.21%), Czechoslovakian (7.8%, a difference of 0.36%), Choctaw (7.9%, a difference of 0.36%), and Immigrants from Fiji (7.8%, a difference of 0.46%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | No Vehicles in Household |
Iraqis | 99.9 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 7.7% |
Basques | 99.9 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 7.8% |
Creek | 99.9 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 7.8% |
Immigrants | Fiji | 99.9 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 7.8% |
Czechoslovakians | 99.9 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 7.8% |
French Canadians | 99.9 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 7.8% |
Swiss | 99.9 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 7.9% |
Chickasaw | 99.9 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 7.9% |
Choctaw | 99.9 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 7.9% |
Immigrants | Nonimmigrants | 99.9 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 7.9% |
Spanish | 99.9 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 7.9% |
Northern Europeans | 99.9 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 7.9% |
Afghans | 99.9 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 8.0% |
Guamanians/Chamorros | 99.9 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 8.0% |
Belgians | 99.9 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 8.0% |