Ugandan vs Chickasaw No Vehicles in Household
COMPARE
Ugandan
Chickasaw
No Vehicles in Household
No Vehicles in Household Comparison
Ugandans
Chickasaw
11.4%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
5.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
229th/ 347
METRIC RANK
7.9%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
43rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Ugandan vs Chickasaw No Vehicles in Household Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 93,973,141 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Ugandans and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.071 and weighted average of 11.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,505,491 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.334 and weighted average of 7.9%, a difference of 45.4%.
No Vehicles in Household Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Ugandan | Chickasaw |
| Minimum | 0.63% | 1.3% |
| Maximum | 17.9% | 15.9% |
| Range | 17.2% | 14.6% |
| Mean | 7.9% | 6.1% |
| Median | 8.0% | 5.5% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.2% | 4.2% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 10.6% | 7.4% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.4% | 3.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.4% | 3.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.3% | 3.0% |
Similar Demographics by No Vehicles in Household
Demographics Similar to Ugandans by No Vehicles in Household
In terms of no vehicles in household, the demographic groups most similar to Ugandans are Immigrants from Romania (11.4%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Pakistan (11.4%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Somalia (11.4%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Norway (11.4%, a difference of 0.13%), and Immigrants from Japan (11.4%, a difference of 0.13%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | No Vehicles in Household |
| Immigrants | South America | 8.0 /100 | #222 | Tragic 11.3% |
| Uruguayans | 7.7 /100 | #223 | Tragic 11.3% |
| Immigrants | Hong Kong | 7.2 /100 | #224 | Tragic 11.3% |
| Immigrants | Sierra Leone | 6.4 /100 | #225 | Tragic 11.3% |
| Immigrants | Somalia | 5.4 /100 | #226 | Tragic 11.4% |
| Immigrants | Pakistan | 5.4 /100 | #227 | Tragic 11.4% |
| Immigrants | Romania | 5.3 /100 | #228 | Tragic 11.4% |
| Ugandans | 5.3 /100 | #229 | Tragic 11.4% |
| Immigrants | Norway | 5.1 /100 | #230 | Tragic 11.4% |
| Immigrants | Japan | 5.1 /100 | #231 | Tragic 11.4% |
| Immigrants | Turkey | 4.8 /100 | #232 | Tragic 11.5% |
| Houma | 4.7 /100 | #233 | Tragic 11.5% |
| Immigrants | Peru | 4.5 /100 | #234 | Tragic 11.5% |
| Kiowa | 4.0 /100 | #235 | Tragic 11.5% |
| Cree | 3.5 /100 | #236 | Tragic 11.6% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by No Vehicles in Household
In terms of no vehicles in household, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Swiss (7.9%, a difference of 0.080%), French Canadian (7.8%, a difference of 0.21%), Czechoslovakian (7.8%, a difference of 0.36%), Choctaw (7.9%, a difference of 0.36%), and Immigrants from Fiji (7.8%, a difference of 0.46%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | No Vehicles in Household |
| Iraqis | 99.9 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 7.7% |
| Basques | 99.9 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 7.8% |
| Creek | 99.9 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 7.8% |
| Immigrants | Fiji | 99.9 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 7.8% |
| Czechoslovakians | 99.9 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 7.8% |
| French Canadians | 99.9 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 7.8% |
| Swiss | 99.9 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 7.9% |
| Chickasaw | 99.9 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 7.9% |
| Choctaw | 99.9 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 7.9% |
| Immigrants | Nonimmigrants | 99.9 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 7.9% |
| Spanish | 99.9 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 7.9% |
| Northern Europeans | 99.9 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 7.9% |
| Afghans | 99.9 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 8.0% |
| Guamanians/Chamorros | 99.9 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 8.0% |
| Belgians | 99.9 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 8.0% |