Korean vs Chickasaw No Vehicles in Household
COMPARE
Korean
 Chickasaw
 No Vehicles in Household
No Vehicles in Household Comparison
Koreans
Chickasaw
8.0%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
51st/ 347
METRIC RANK
7.9%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
43rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Korean vs Chickasaw No Vehicles in Household Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 508,454,508 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Koreans and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.129 and weighted average of 8.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,505,491 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.334 and weighted average of 7.9%, a difference of 1.7%.
 
No Vehicles in Household Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Korean | Chickasaw | 
| Minimum | 1.4% | 1.3% | 
| Maximum | 14.9% | 15.9% | 
| Range | 13.6% | 14.6% | 
| Mean | 6.0% | 6.1% | 
| Median | 5.4% | 5.5% | 
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.1% | 4.2% | 
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 7.2% | 7.4% | 
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.1% | 3.2% | 
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.9% | 3.1% | 
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.9% | 3.0% | 
Demographics Similar to Koreans and Chickasaw by No Vehicles in Household
In terms of no vehicles in household, the demographic groups most similar to Koreans are Belgian (8.0%, a difference of 0.10%), Guamanian/Chamorro (8.0%, a difference of 0.17%), Afghan (8.0%, a difference of 0.34%), Hawaiian (8.0%, a difference of 0.58%), and Slovene (8.0%, a difference of 0.58%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Swiss (7.9%, a difference of 0.080%), French Canadian (7.8%, a difference of 0.21%), Czechoslovakian (7.8%, a difference of 0.36%), Choctaw (7.9%, a difference of 0.36%), and Immigrants from Fiji (7.8%, a difference of 0.46%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | No Vehicles in Household | 
| Basques | 99.9 /100 | #37  | Exceptional 7.8%  | 
| Creek | 99.9 /100 | #38  | Exceptional 7.8%  | 
| Immigrants | Fiji | 99.9 /100 | #39  | Exceptional 7.8%  | 
| Czechoslovakians | 99.9 /100 | #40  | Exceptional 7.8%  | 
| French Canadians | 99.9 /100 | #41  | Exceptional 7.8%  | 
| Swiss | 99.9 /100 | #42  | Exceptional 7.9%  | 
| Chickasaw | 99.9 /100 | #43  | Exceptional 7.9%  | 
| Choctaw | 99.9 /100 | #44  | Exceptional 7.9%  | 
| Immigrants | Nonimmigrants | 99.9 /100 | #45  | Exceptional 7.9%  | 
| Spanish | 99.9 /100 | #46  | Exceptional 7.9%  | 
| Northern Europeans | 99.9 /100 | #47  | Exceptional 7.9%  | 
| Afghans | 99.9 /100 | #48  | Exceptional 8.0%  | 
| Guamanians/Chamorros | 99.9 /100 | #49  | Exceptional 8.0%  | 
| Belgians | 99.9 /100 | #50  | Exceptional 8.0%  | 
| Koreans | 99.9 /100 | #51  | Exceptional 8.0%  | 
| Hawaiians | 99.9 /100 | #52  | Exceptional 8.0%  | 
| Slovenes | 99.9 /100 | #53  | Exceptional 8.0%  | 
| Immigrants | Venezuela | 99.9 /100 | #54  | Exceptional 8.1%  | 
| Celtics | 99.9 /100 | #55  | Exceptional 8.1%  | 
| Immigrants | Afghanistan | 99.9 /100 | #56  | Exceptional 8.1%  | 
| Venezuelans | 99.8 /100 | #57  | Exceptional 8.1%  |