South American Indian vs Italian Single Male Poverty
COMPARE
South American Indian
Italian
Single Male Poverty
Single Male Poverty Comparison
South American Indians
Italians
12.1%
SINGLE MALE POVERTY
98.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
90th/ 347
METRIC RANK
13.1%
SINGLE MALE POVERTY
15.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
213th/ 347
METRIC RANK
South American Indian vs Italian Single Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 154,904,356 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of South American Indians and poverty level among single males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.691 and weighted average of 12.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 474,306,770 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Italians and poverty level among single males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.145 and weighted average of 13.1%, a difference of 7.9%.
Single Male Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | South American Indian | Italian |
| Minimum | 5.4% | 1.1% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 41.2% |
| Range | 94.6% | 40.1% |
| Mean | 20.7% | 13.1% |
| Median | 12.5% | 12.9% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 9.2% | 11.2% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 27.0% | 14.3% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 17.8% | 3.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 21.6% | 5.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 21.1% | 5.0% |
Similar Demographics by Single Male Poverty
Demographics Similar to South American Indians by Single Male Poverty
In terms of single male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to South American Indians are Immigrants from Ireland (12.1%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Turkey (12.1%, a difference of 0.050%), Spanish American Indian (12.1%, a difference of 0.16%), South American (12.1%, a difference of 0.18%), and Immigrants from Eritrea (12.1%, a difference of 0.18%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Male Poverty |
| Immigrants | Chile | 98.6 /100 | #83 | Exceptional 12.1% |
| Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 98.6 /100 | #84 | Exceptional 12.1% |
| Turks | 98.5 /100 | #85 | Exceptional 12.1% |
| Immigrants | Israel | 98.5 /100 | #86 | Exceptional 12.1% |
| South Americans | 98.5 /100 | #87 | Exceptional 12.1% |
| Immigrants | Eritrea | 98.5 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 12.1% |
| Immigrants | Ireland | 98.3 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 12.1% |
| South American Indians | 98.3 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 12.1% |
| Immigrants | Turkey | 98.2 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 12.1% |
| Spanish American Indians | 98.0 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 12.1% |
| Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 97.9 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 12.1% |
| Colombians | 97.8 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 12.2% |
| Mongolians | 97.7 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 12.2% |
| Immigrants | Sweden | 97.5 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 12.2% |
| Immigrants | Italy | 97.4 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 12.2% |
Demographics Similar to Italians by Single Male Poverty
In terms of single male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Italians are Senegalese (13.1%, a difference of 0.050%), Swedish (13.1%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Haiti (13.1%, a difference of 0.090%), Zimbabwean (13.1%, a difference of 0.090%), and Japanese (13.1%, a difference of 0.11%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Male Poverty |
| Northern Europeans | 18.9 /100 | #206 | Poor 13.0% |
| Sudanese | 17.7 /100 | #207 | Poor 13.1% |
| Immigrants | Western Africa | 17.6 /100 | #208 | Poor 13.1% |
| Mexican American Indians | 17.5 /100 | #209 | Poor 13.1% |
| Immigrants | Haiti | 16.8 /100 | #210 | Poor 13.1% |
| Swedes | 16.8 /100 | #211 | Poor 13.1% |
| Senegalese | 16.4 /100 | #212 | Poor 13.1% |
| Italians | 15.9 /100 | #213 | Poor 13.1% |
| Zimbabweans | 14.9 /100 | #214 | Poor 13.1% |
| Japanese | 14.8 /100 | #215 | Poor 13.1% |
| Austrians | 13.9 /100 | #216 | Poor 13.1% |
| Bermudans | 13.0 /100 | #217 | Poor 13.1% |
| Scandinavians | 12.9 /100 | #218 | Poor 13.1% |
| Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 12.6 /100 | #219 | Poor 13.1% |
| Central Americans | 10.9 /100 | #220 | Poor 13.2% |