Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Serbian Single Male Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Zimbabwe
Serbian
Single Male Poverty
Single Male Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Zimbabwe
Serbians
12.6%
SINGLE MALE POVERTY
78.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
140th/ 347
METRIC RANK
12.5%
SINGLE MALE POVERTY
87.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
122nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Serbian Single Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 112,161,655 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Zimbabwe and poverty level among single males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.277 and weighted average of 12.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 240,171,110 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Serbians and poverty level among single males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.369 and weighted average of 12.5%, a difference of 0.96%.
Single Male Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Zimbabwe | Serbian |
| Minimum | 2.3% | 3.8% |
| Maximum | 48.4% | 42.9% |
| Range | 46.1% | 39.0% |
| Mean | 16.1% | 18.1% |
| Median | 12.7% | 13.3% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 8.9% | 11.7% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 15.3% | 23.5% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.4% | 11.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 11.8% | 11.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 11.6% | 11.2% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Serbians by Single Male Poverty
In terms of single male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Zimbabwe are Cuban (12.6%, a difference of 0.15%), Immigrants from El Salvador (12.6%, a difference of 0.16%), Okinawan (12.6%, a difference of 0.16%), Ukrainian (12.6%, a difference of 0.22%), and Immigrants from Costa Rica (12.5%, a difference of 0.33%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Serbians are Immigrants from Kenya (12.5%, a difference of 0.040%), Icelander (12.5%, a difference of 0.050%), Russian (12.5%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Jordan (12.5%, a difference of 0.10%), and Romanian (12.5%, a difference of 0.18%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Male Poverty |
| Icelanders | 88.2 /100 | #121 | Excellent 12.5% |
| Serbians | 87.9 /100 | #122 | Excellent 12.5% |
| Immigrants | Kenya | 87.6 /100 | #123 | Excellent 12.5% |
| Russians | 87.3 /100 | #124 | Excellent 12.5% |
| Immigrants | Jordan | 87.1 /100 | #125 | Excellent 12.5% |
| Romanians | 86.4 /100 | #126 | Excellent 12.5% |
| Immigrants | Netherlands | 86.2 /100 | #127 | Excellent 12.5% |
| Ecuadorians | 85.9 /100 | #128 | Excellent 12.5% |
| Immigrants | Sierra Leone | 85.5 /100 | #129 | Excellent 12.5% |
| Immigrants | Nicaragua | 84.8 /100 | #130 | Excellent 12.5% |
| Immigrants | Northern Europe | 83.7 /100 | #131 | Excellent 12.5% |
| Salvadorans | 83.7 /100 | #132 | Excellent 12.5% |
| Immigrants | Western Asia | 83.4 /100 | #133 | Excellent 12.5% |
| Immigrants | Ecuador | 82.1 /100 | #134 | Excellent 12.5% |
| Immigrants | Costa Rica | 81.9 /100 | #135 | Excellent 12.5% |
| Immigrants | Austria | 81.9 /100 | #136 | Excellent 12.5% |
| Ukrainians | 80.7 /100 | #137 | Excellent 12.6% |
| Immigrants | El Salvador | 80.0 /100 | #138 | Excellent 12.6% |
| Cubans | 79.9 /100 | #139 | Good 12.6% |
| Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 78.0 /100 | #140 | Good 12.6% |
| Okinawans | 75.9 /100 | #141 | Good 12.6% |