Hungarian vs Yugoslavian Family Poverty
COMPARE
Hungarian
Yugoslavian
Family Poverty
Family Poverty Comparison
Hungarians
Yugoslavians
8.8%
FAMILY POVERTY
67.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
160th/ 347
METRIC RANK
8.5%
FAMILY POVERTY
83.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
142nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Hungarian vs Yugoslavian Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 483,762,053 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Hungarians and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.634 and weighted average of 8.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 285,303,830 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Yugoslavians and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.001 and weighted average of 8.5%, a difference of 3.1%.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d4286/d4286c6dd58720f2b347956a3a5b6429fdb85fc0" alt="Hungarian vs Yugoslavian Family Poverty"
Family Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Hungarian | Yugoslavian |
Minimum | 2.4% | 2.1% |
Maximum | 82.8% | 24.8% |
Range | 80.4% | 22.7% |
Mean | 16.1% | 7.7% |
Median | 9.5% | 7.3% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.9% | 4.3% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 20.9% | 9.0% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 13.9% | 4.8% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 15.7% | 4.8% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 15.6% | 4.7% |
Demographics Similar to Hungarians and Yugoslavians by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Hungarians are Immigrants from Northern Africa (8.8%, a difference of 0.040%), Peruvian (8.8%, a difference of 0.13%), White/Caucasian (8.8%, a difference of 0.30%), Tsimshian (8.8%, a difference of 0.34%), and Immigrants from Oceania (8.7%, a difference of 0.64%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Yugoslavians are Immigrants from Germany (8.5%, a difference of 0.030%), Albanian (8.5%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from South Eastern Asia (8.5%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Belarus (8.5%, a difference of 0.080%), and Immigrants from Ukraine (8.5%, a difference of 0.11%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
Immigrants | Ukraine | 83.9 /100 | #141 | Excellent 8.5% |
Yugoslavians | 83.5 /100 | #142 | Excellent 8.5% |
Immigrants | Germany | 83.3 /100 | #143 | Excellent 8.5% |
Albanians | 83.3 /100 | #144 | Excellent 8.5% |
Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 83.2 /100 | #145 | Excellent 8.5% |
Immigrants | Belarus | 83.2 /100 | #146 | Excellent 8.5% |
Immigrants | Jordan | 83.0 /100 | #147 | Excellent 8.5% |
Scotch-Irish | 82.2 /100 | #148 | Excellent 8.6% |
Mongolians | 80.4 /100 | #149 | Excellent 8.6% |
Syrians | 80.3 /100 | #150 | Excellent 8.6% |
Brazilians | 80.1 /100 | #151 | Excellent 8.6% |
Samoans | 79.8 /100 | #152 | Good 8.6% |
Immigrants | Spain | 79.1 /100 | #153 | Good 8.6% |
Immigrants | Vietnam | 75.4 /100 | #154 | Good 8.7% |
Immigrants | Kuwait | 73.6 /100 | #155 | Good 8.7% |
Immigrants | Oceania | 71.2 /100 | #156 | Good 8.7% |
Tsimshian | 69.3 /100 | #157 | Good 8.8% |
Whites/Caucasians | 69.1 /100 | #158 | Good 8.8% |
Peruvians | 68.0 /100 | #159 | Good 8.8% |
Hungarians | 67.2 /100 | #160 | Good 8.8% |
Immigrants | Northern Africa | 66.9 /100 | #161 | Good 8.8% |