Czechoslovakian vs Native Hawaiian Poverty
COMPARE
Czechoslovakian
Native Hawaiian
Poverty
Poverty Comparison
Czechoslovakians
Native Hawaiians
11.4%
POVERTY
95.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
89th/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.6%
POVERTY
92.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
104th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Czechoslovakian vs Native Hawaiian Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 368,518,810 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Czechoslovakians and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.060 and weighted average of 11.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 331,880,799 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Native Hawaiians and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.364 and weighted average of 11.6%, a difference of 1.7%.
Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Czechoslovakian | Native Hawaiian |
| Minimum | 0.33% | 2.7% |
| Maximum | 27.8% | 30.7% |
| Range | 27.5% | 28.0% |
| Mean | 12.1% | 11.9% |
| Median | 11.4% | 10.7% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 8.7% | 7.6% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 16.8% | 13.6% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 8.1% | 6.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.5% | 5.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.4% | 5.9% |
Demographics Similar to Czechoslovakians and Native Hawaiians by Poverty
In terms of poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Czechoslovakians are Belgian (11.4%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Denmark (11.4%, a difference of 0.17%), Jordanian (11.4%, a difference of 0.18%), Northern European (11.4%, a difference of 0.18%), and Finnish (11.4%, a difference of 0.30%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Native Hawaiians are Portuguese (11.6%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Zimbabwe (11.6%, a difference of 0.020%), Laotian (11.6%, a difference of 0.11%), Okinawan (11.6%, a difference of 0.11%), and Slavic (11.5%, a difference of 0.45%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Poverty |
| Jordanians | 96.0 /100 | #86 | Exceptional 11.4% |
| Northern Europeans | 96.0 /100 | #87 | Exceptional 11.4% |
| Belgians | 95.8 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 11.4% |
| Czechoslovakians | 95.7 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 11.4% |
| Immigrants | Denmark | 95.5 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 11.4% |
| Finns | 95.2 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 11.4% |
| British | 95.0 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 11.4% |
| Romanians | 94.9 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 11.4% |
| Paraguayans | 94.9 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 11.4% |
| Australians | 94.9 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 11.4% |
| Immigrants | South Africa | 94.7 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 11.5% |
| Immigrants | Egypt | 94.6 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 11.5% |
| Immigrants | Latvia | 94.5 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 11.5% |
| Immigrants | Indonesia | 94.2 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 11.5% |
| Scottish | 94.0 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 11.5% |
| Slavs | 93.3 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 11.5% |
| Laotians | 92.4 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Okinawans | 92.4 /100 | #103 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Native Hawaiians | 92.1 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Portuguese | 92.1 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 92.1 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 11.6% |