Czechoslovakian vs Paraguayan Poverty
COMPARE
Czechoslovakian
Paraguayan
Poverty
Poverty Comparison
Czechoslovakians
Paraguayans
11.4%
POVERTY
95.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
89th/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.4%
POVERTY
94.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
94th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Czechoslovakian vs Paraguayan Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 368,518,810 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Czechoslovakians and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.060 and weighted average of 11.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 95,102,151 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Paraguayans and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.047 and weighted average of 11.4%, a difference of 0.49%.
Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Czechoslovakian | Paraguayan |
Minimum | 0.33% | 1.5% |
Maximum | 27.8% | 21.1% |
Range | 27.5% | 19.6% |
Mean | 12.1% | 9.4% |
Median | 11.4% | 9.4% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 8.7% | 5.1% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 16.8% | 12.2% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 8.1% | 7.2% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.5% | 4.8% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.4% | 4.8% |
Demographics Similar to Czechoslovakians and Paraguayans by Poverty
In terms of poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Czechoslovakians are Belgian (11.4%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Denmark (11.4%, a difference of 0.17%), Jordanian (11.4%, a difference of 0.18%), Northern European (11.4%, a difference of 0.18%), and Immigrants from England (11.4%, a difference of 0.30%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Paraguayans are Australian (11.4%, a difference of 0.0%), Romanian (11.4%, a difference of 0.020%), British (11.4%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from South Africa (11.5%, a difference of 0.12%), and Immigrants from Egypt (11.5%, a difference of 0.16%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Poverty |
Irish | 96.6 /100 | #81 | Exceptional 11.3% |
Egyptians | 96.5 /100 | #82 | Exceptional 11.3% |
Immigrants | Sweden | 96.3 /100 | #83 | Exceptional 11.3% |
English | 96.3 /100 | #84 | Exceptional 11.3% |
Immigrants | England | 96.2 /100 | #85 | Exceptional 11.4% |
Jordanians | 96.0 /100 | #86 | Exceptional 11.4% |
Northern Europeans | 96.0 /100 | #87 | Exceptional 11.4% |
Belgians | 95.8 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 11.4% |
Czechoslovakians | 95.7 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 11.4% |
Immigrants | Denmark | 95.5 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 11.4% |
Finns | 95.2 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 11.4% |
British | 95.0 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 11.4% |
Romanians | 94.9 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 11.4% |
Paraguayans | 94.9 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 11.4% |
Australians | 94.9 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 11.4% |
Immigrants | South Africa | 94.7 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 11.5% |
Immigrants | Egypt | 94.6 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 11.5% |
Immigrants | Latvia | 94.5 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 11.5% |
Immigrants | Indonesia | 94.2 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 11.5% |
Scottish | 94.0 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 11.5% |
Slavs | 93.3 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 11.5% |