Sioux vs Turkish Married-Couple Family Poverty
COMPARE
Sioux
Turkish
Married-Couple Family Poverty
Married-Couple Family Poverty Comparison
Sioux
Turks
8.7%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
335th/ 347
METRIC RANK
4.3%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
99.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
49th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Sioux vs Turkish Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 232,751,965 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Sioux and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.623 and weighted average of 8.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 270,078,353 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Turks and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.361 and weighted average of 4.3%, a difference of 101.6%.
Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Sioux | Turkish |
| Minimum | 0.94% | 0.78% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 16.2% |
| Range | 99.1% | 15.5% |
| Mean | 21.0% | 4.6% |
| Median | 9.4% | 3.6% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.3% | 2.6% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 28.6% | 4.9% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 23.3% | 2.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 23.8% | 3.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 23.7% | 3.5% |
Similar Demographics by Married-Couple Family Poverty
Demographics Similar to Sioux by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Sioux are Apache (9.0%, a difference of 2.9%), Yakama (9.0%, a difference of 3.0%), Immigrants from Dominican Republic (8.4%, a difference of 3.6%), Lumbee (8.3%, a difference of 4.3%), and Dominican (8.3%, a difference of 4.8%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
| Immigrants | Mexico | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 7.6% |
| Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 8.2% |
| Paiute | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 8.3% |
| Central American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 8.3% |
| Dominicans | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 8.3% |
| Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 8.3% |
| Immigrants | Dominican Republic | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 8.4% |
| Sioux | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 8.7% |
| Apache | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 9.0% |
| Yakama | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 9.0% |
| Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 9.4% |
| Crow | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 9.6% |
| Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 9.7% |
| Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 11.1% |
| Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 11.2% |
Demographics Similar to Turks by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Turks are Australian (4.3%, a difference of 0.080%), Burmese (4.3%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Lithuania (4.3%, a difference of 0.11%), Russian (4.3%, a difference of 0.13%), and Immigrants from South Central Asia (4.3%, a difference of 0.15%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
| Scottish | 99.8 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Swiss | 99.8 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Immigrants | Japan | 99.8 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Serbians | 99.8 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| British | 99.8 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Immigrants | South Central Asia | 99.8 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Australians | 99.7 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Turks | 99.7 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Burmese | 99.7 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.7 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Russians | 99.7 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Welsh | 99.7 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Austrians | 99.7 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| French | 99.7 /100 | #55 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 99.7 /100 | #56 | Exceptional 4.3% |