Slovene vs Turkish Married-Couple Family Poverty
COMPARE
Slovene
Turkish
Married-Couple Family Poverty
Married-Couple Family Poverty Comparison
Slovenes
Turks
3.8%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
4th/ 347
METRIC RANK
4.3%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
99.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
49th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Slovene vs Turkish Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 259,368,188 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Slovenes and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.149 and weighted average of 3.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 270,078,353 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Turks and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.361 and weighted average of 4.3%, a difference of 12.1%.
Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Slovene | Turkish |
| Minimum | 0.24% | 0.78% |
| Maximum | 14.4% | 16.2% |
| Range | 14.2% | 15.5% |
| Mean | 3.8% | 4.6% |
| Median | 3.3% | 3.6% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.3% | 2.6% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 4.7% | 4.9% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.4% | 2.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.4% | 3.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.4% | 3.5% |
Similar Demographics by Married-Couple Family Poverty
Demographics Similar to Slovenes by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Slovenes are Swedish (3.9%, a difference of 0.15%), Luxembourger (3.9%, a difference of 0.76%), Latvian (3.9%, a difference of 1.3%), Thai (3.9%, a difference of 1.8%), and Croatian (3.9%, a difference of 2.3%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
| Immigrants | India | 100.0 /100 | #1 | Exceptional 3.6% |
| Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #2 | Exceptional 3.6% |
| Norwegians | 100.0 /100 | #3 | Exceptional 3.7% |
| Slovenes | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 3.8% |
| Swedes | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 3.9% |
| Luxembourgers | 100.0 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 3.9% |
| Latvians | 100.0 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 3.9% |
| Thais | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 3.9% |
| Croatians | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 3.9% |
| Carpatho Rusyns | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 3.9% |
| Lithuanians | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 4.0% |
| Bulgarians | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 4.0% |
| Czechs | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 4.0% |
| Slovaks | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 4.0% |
| Poles | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 4.0% |
Demographics Similar to Turks by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Turks are Australian (4.3%, a difference of 0.080%), Burmese (4.3%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Lithuania (4.3%, a difference of 0.11%), Russian (4.3%, a difference of 0.13%), and Immigrants from South Central Asia (4.3%, a difference of 0.15%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
| Scottish | 99.8 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Swiss | 99.8 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Immigrants | Japan | 99.8 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Serbians | 99.8 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| British | 99.8 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Immigrants | South Central Asia | 99.8 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Australians | 99.7 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Turks | 99.7 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Burmese | 99.7 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.7 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Russians | 99.7 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Welsh | 99.7 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Austrians | 99.7 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| French | 99.7 /100 | #55 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 99.7 /100 | #56 | Exceptional 4.3% |