Liberian vs Turkish Married-Couple Family Poverty
COMPARE
Liberian
Turkish
Married-Couple Family Poverty
Married-Couple Family Poverty Comparison
Liberians
Turks
5.4%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
26.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
197th/ 347
METRIC RANK
4.3%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
99.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
49th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Liberian vs Turkish Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 117,684,322 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Liberians and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.107 and weighted average of 5.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 270,078,353 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Turks and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.361 and weighted average of 4.3%, a difference of 24.6%.
Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Liberian | Turkish |
Minimum | 0.41% | 0.78% |
Maximum | 18.2% | 16.2% |
Range | 17.8% | 15.5% |
Mean | 5.4% | 4.6% |
Median | 5.2% | 3.6% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.2% | 2.6% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 6.6% | 4.9% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.4% | 2.4% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.4% | 3.6% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.4% | 3.5% |
Similar Demographics by Married-Couple Family Poverty
Demographics Similar to Liberians by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Liberians are Immigrants from Belarus (5.4%, a difference of 0.020%), Spaniard (5.4%, a difference of 0.15%), Immigrants from the Azores (5.4%, a difference of 0.17%), Uruguayan (5.4%, a difference of 0.20%), and Immigrants from Israel (5.4%, a difference of 0.22%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
Ugandans | 31.6 /100 | #190 | Fair 5.3% |
Immigrants | Cabo Verde | 30.9 /100 | #191 | Fair 5.3% |
Cape Verdeans | 30.7 /100 | #192 | Fair 5.3% |
Malaysians | 29.5 /100 | #193 | Fair 5.4% |
Immigrants | Israel | 27.8 /100 | #194 | Fair 5.4% |
Immigrants | Azores | 27.5 /100 | #195 | Fair 5.4% |
Spaniards | 27.4 /100 | #196 | Fair 5.4% |
Liberians | 26.3 /100 | #197 | Fair 5.4% |
Immigrants | Belarus | 26.2 /100 | #198 | Fair 5.4% |
Uruguayans | 25.0 /100 | #199 | Fair 5.4% |
Immigrants | Morocco | 24.3 /100 | #200 | Fair 5.4% |
Lebanese | 24.1 /100 | #201 | Fair 5.4% |
Immigrants | Middle Africa | 23.8 /100 | #202 | Fair 5.4% |
Immigrants | Peru | 21.8 /100 | #203 | Fair 5.4% |
Immigrants | Costa Rica | 19.4 /100 | #204 | Poor 5.4% |
Demographics Similar to Turks by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Turks are Australian (4.3%, a difference of 0.080%), Burmese (4.3%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Lithuania (4.3%, a difference of 0.11%), Russian (4.3%, a difference of 0.13%), and Immigrants from South Central Asia (4.3%, a difference of 0.15%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
Scottish | 99.8 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 4.3% |
Swiss | 99.8 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 4.3% |
Immigrants | Japan | 99.8 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 4.3% |
Serbians | 99.8 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 4.3% |
British | 99.8 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 4.3% |
Immigrants | South Central Asia | 99.8 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 4.3% |
Australians | 99.7 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 4.3% |
Turks | 99.7 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 4.3% |
Burmese | 99.7 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 4.3% |
Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.7 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 4.3% |
Russians | 99.7 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 4.3% |
Welsh | 99.7 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 4.3% |
Austrians | 99.7 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 4.3% |
French | 99.7 /100 | #55 | Exceptional 4.3% |
Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 99.7 /100 | #56 | Exceptional 4.3% |