Bolivian vs Turkish Married-Couple Family Poverty
COMPARE
Bolivian
Turkish
Married-Couple Family Poverty
Married-Couple Family Poverty Comparison
Bolivians
Turks
4.6%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
98.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
88th/ 347
METRIC RANK
4.3%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
99.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
49th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Bolivian vs Turkish Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 183,808,216 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Bolivians and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.303 and weighted average of 4.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 270,078,353 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Turks and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.361 and weighted average of 4.3%, a difference of 6.1%.

Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Bolivian | Turkish |
Minimum | 0.69% | 0.78% |
Maximum | 28.7% | 16.2% |
Range | 28.0% | 15.5% |
Mean | 5.3% | 4.6% |
Median | 4.2% | 3.6% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.0% | 2.6% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 5.6% | 4.9% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.6% | 2.4% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.5% | 3.6% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.5% | 3.5% |
Similar Demographics by Married-Couple Family Poverty
Demographics Similar to Bolivians by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Bolivians are Immigrants from North Macedonia (4.6%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Czechoslovakia (4.6%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Turkey (4.6%, a difference of 0.18%), Immigrants from Switzerland (4.6%, a difference of 0.18%), and South African (4.6%, a difference of 0.22%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
Immigrants | Greece | 98.9 /100 | #81 | Exceptional 4.5% |
Canadians | 98.8 /100 | #82 | Exceptional 4.5% |
Immigrants | Denmark | 98.8 /100 | #83 | Exceptional 4.6% |
Immigrants | Croatia | 98.7 /100 | #84 | Exceptional 4.6% |
South Africans | 98.7 /100 | #85 | Exceptional 4.6% |
Immigrants | Turkey | 98.6 /100 | #86 | Exceptional 4.6% |
Immigrants | North Macedonia | 98.6 /100 | #87 | Exceptional 4.6% |
Bolivians | 98.6 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 4.6% |
Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 98.5 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 4.6% |
Immigrants | Switzerland | 98.5 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 4.6% |
Basques | 98.5 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 4.6% |
Immigrants | Norway | 98.4 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 4.6% |
Koreans | 98.3 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 4.6% |
Immigrants | Italy | 98.3 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 4.6% |
Portuguese | 98.3 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 4.6% |
Demographics Similar to Turks by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Turks are Australian (4.3%, a difference of 0.080%), Burmese (4.3%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Lithuania (4.3%, a difference of 0.11%), Russian (4.3%, a difference of 0.13%), and Immigrants from South Central Asia (4.3%, a difference of 0.15%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
Scottish | 99.8 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 4.3% |
Swiss | 99.8 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 4.3% |
Immigrants | Japan | 99.8 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 4.3% |
Serbians | 99.8 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 4.3% |
British | 99.8 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 4.3% |
Immigrants | South Central Asia | 99.8 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 4.3% |
Australians | 99.7 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 4.3% |
Turks | 99.7 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 4.3% |
Burmese | 99.7 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 4.3% |
Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.7 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 4.3% |
Russians | 99.7 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 4.3% |
Welsh | 99.7 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 4.3% |
Austrians | 99.7 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 4.3% |
French | 99.7 /100 | #55 | Exceptional 4.3% |
Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 99.7 /100 | #56 | Exceptional 4.3% |