Sierra Leonean vs Turkish Married-Couple Family Poverty
COMPARE
Sierra Leonean
Turkish
Married-Couple Family Poverty
Married-Couple Family Poverty Comparison
Sierra Leoneans
Turks
5.1%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
64.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
163rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
4.3%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
99.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
49th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Sierra Leonean vs Turkish Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 83,227,965 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Sierra Leoneans and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.153 and weighted average of 5.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 270,078,353 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Turks and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.361 and weighted average of 4.3%, a difference of 18.9%.
Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Sierra Leonean | Turkish |
| Minimum | 0.45% | 0.78% |
| Maximum | 10.4% | 16.2% |
| Range | 9.9% | 15.5% |
| Mean | 4.3% | 4.6% |
| Median | 4.4% | 3.6% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.7% | 2.6% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 5.8% | 4.9% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.1% | 2.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.3% | 3.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.2% | 3.5% |
Similar Demographics by Married-Couple Family Poverty
Demographics Similar to Sierra Leoneans by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Sierra Leoneans are Hawaiian (5.1%, a difference of 0.24%), Immigrants from Malaysia (5.1%, a difference of 0.25%), Immigrants from Jordan (5.1%, a difference of 0.31%), Paraguayan (5.1%, a difference of 0.34%), and Costa Rican (5.1%, a difference of 0.34%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
| Sri Lankans | 72.2 /100 | #156 | Good 5.1% |
| Argentineans | 70.7 /100 | #157 | Good 5.1% |
| Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 70.4 /100 | #158 | Good 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Saudi Arabia | 70.3 /100 | #159 | Good 5.1% |
| Pennsylvania Germans | 68.5 /100 | #160 | Good 5.1% |
| Ethiopians | 68.1 /100 | #161 | Good 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Jordan | 66.5 /100 | #162 | Good 5.1% |
| Sierra Leoneans | 64.1 /100 | #163 | Good 5.1% |
| Hawaiians | 62.3 /100 | #164 | Good 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Malaysia | 62.2 /100 | #165 | Good 5.1% |
| Paraguayans | 61.5 /100 | #166 | Good 5.1% |
| Costa Ricans | 61.5 /100 | #167 | Good 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Uganda | 54.9 /100 | #168 | Average 5.2% |
| Ottawa | 54.5 /100 | #169 | Average 5.2% |
| Immigrants | Argentina | 54.4 /100 | #170 | Average 5.2% |
Demographics Similar to Turks by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Turks are Australian (4.3%, a difference of 0.080%), Burmese (4.3%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Lithuania (4.3%, a difference of 0.11%), Russian (4.3%, a difference of 0.13%), and Immigrants from South Central Asia (4.3%, a difference of 0.15%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
| Scottish | 99.8 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Swiss | 99.8 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Immigrants | Japan | 99.8 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Serbians | 99.8 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| British | 99.8 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Immigrants | South Central Asia | 99.8 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Australians | 99.7 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Turks | 99.7 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Burmese | 99.7 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.7 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Russians | 99.7 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Welsh | 99.7 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Austrians | 99.7 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| French | 99.7 /100 | #55 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 99.7 /100 | #56 | Exceptional 4.3% |