Palestinian vs Chinese Family Poverty
COMPARE
Palestinian
Chinese
Family Poverty
Family Poverty Comparison
Palestinians
Chinese
8.3%
FAMILY POVERTY
91.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
123rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
6.5%
FAMILY POVERTY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
2nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Palestinian vs Chinese Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 216,211,799 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Palestinians and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.022 and weighted average of 8.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,784,795 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Chinese and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.039 and weighted average of 6.5%, a difference of 27.9%.
Family Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Palestinian | Chinese |
| Minimum | 0.67% | 1.3% |
| Maximum | 21.0% | 19.1% |
| Range | 20.3% | 17.8% |
| Mean | 8.5% | 6.8% |
| Median | 7.9% | 6.3% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.8% | 3.5% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 10.7% | 9.0% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.9% | 5.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.5% | 4.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.4% | 4.1% |
Similar Demographics by Family Poverty
Demographics Similar to Palestinians by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Palestinians are Paraguayan (8.3%, a difference of 0.070%), Native Hawaiian (8.3%, a difference of 0.080%), Soviet Union (8.3%, a difference of 0.10%), Pakistani (8.3%, a difference of 0.14%), and Immigrants from Egypt (8.3%, a difference of 0.25%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
| South Africans | 93.4 /100 | #116 | Exceptional 8.2% |
| Immigrants | Russia | 93.2 /100 | #117 | Exceptional 8.2% |
| Immigrants | Western Europe | 92.9 /100 | #118 | Exceptional 8.2% |
| French | 92.8 /100 | #119 | Exceptional 8.3% |
| Immigrants | Egypt | 91.6 /100 | #120 | Exceptional 8.3% |
| Native Hawaiians | 91.3 /100 | #121 | Exceptional 8.3% |
| Paraguayans | 91.2 /100 | #122 | Exceptional 8.3% |
| Palestinians | 91.1 /100 | #123 | Exceptional 8.3% |
| Soviet Union | 90.8 /100 | #124 | Exceptional 8.3% |
| Pakistanis | 90.8 /100 | #125 | Exceptional 8.3% |
| Icelanders | 90.3 /100 | #126 | Exceptional 8.3% |
| Immigrants | Hungary | 89.9 /100 | #127 | Excellent 8.4% |
| Argentineans | 89.6 /100 | #128 | Excellent 8.4% |
| Portuguese | 89.2 /100 | #129 | Excellent 8.4% |
| Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 88.6 /100 | #130 | Excellent 8.4% |
Demographics Similar to Chinese by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chinese are Immigrants from Taiwan (6.6%, a difference of 1.6%), Filipino (6.6%, a difference of 2.2%), Thai (6.7%, a difference of 2.8%), Immigrants from India (6.2%, a difference of 4.3%), and Norwegian (6.9%, a difference of 5.9%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
| Immigrants | India | 100.0 /100 | #1 | Exceptional 6.2% |
| Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #2 | Exceptional 6.5% |
| Immigrants | Taiwan | 100.0 /100 | #3 | Exceptional 6.6% |
| Filipinos | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 6.6% |
| Thais | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 6.7% |
| Norwegians | 99.9 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 6.9% |
| Immigrants | Ireland | 99.9 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 7.0% |
| Bhutanese | 99.9 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 7.0% |
| Latvians | 99.9 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 7.1% |
| Bulgarians | 99.8 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 7.1% |
| Immigrants | Singapore | 99.8 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 7.1% |
| Maltese | 99.8 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 7.1% |
| Swedes | 99.8 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 7.1% |
| Iranians | 99.8 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 7.1% |
| Lithuanians | 99.8 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 7.2% |