Pakistani vs Chickasaw Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
COMPARE
Pakistani
Chickasaw
Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 Comparison
Pakistanis
Chickasaw
15.1%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG BOYS UNDER 16
94.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
109th/ 347
METRIC RANK
19.8%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG BOYS UNDER 16
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
271st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Pakistani vs Chickasaw Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 331,571,147 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Pakistanis and poverty level among boys under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.692 and weighted average of 15.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 146,816,928 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and poverty level among boys under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.488 and weighted average of 19.8%, a difference of 31.1%.
Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Pakistani | Chickasaw |
Minimum | 4.9% | 3.3% |
Maximum | 82.1% | 100.0% |
Range | 77.1% | 96.7% |
Mean | 21.9% | 27.0% |
Median | 15.5% | 23.7% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 13.0% | 18.1% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 21.7% | 30.0% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 8.7% | 11.9% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 17.2% | 15.5% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 17.1% | 15.4% |
Similar Demographics by Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
Demographics Similar to Pakistanis by Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
In terms of child poverty among boys under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Pakistanis are Immigrants from England (15.1%, a difference of 0.040%), Jordanian (15.1%, a difference of 0.21%), English (15.1%, a difference of 0.26%), Immigrants from Zimbabwe (15.2%, a difference of 0.31%), and Serbian (15.1%, a difference of 0.32%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 |
Romanians | 95.6 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 15.0% |
Immigrants | Denmark | 95.6 /100 | #103 | Exceptional 15.0% |
Immigrants | Switzerland | 95.4 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 15.0% |
Dutch | 95.4 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 15.0% |
Serbians | 95.2 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 15.1% |
Jordanians | 95.1 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 15.1% |
Immigrants | England | 94.8 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 15.1% |
Pakistanis | 94.7 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 15.1% |
English | 94.3 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 15.1% |
Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 94.2 /100 | #111 | Exceptional 15.2% |
Basques | 93.8 /100 | #112 | Exceptional 15.2% |
Irish | 93.8 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 15.2% |
Immigrants | Ukraine | 93.6 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 15.2% |
Armenians | 93.6 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 15.2% |
Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 93.5 /100 | #116 | Exceptional 15.2% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
In terms of child poverty among boys under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Immigrants from Ecuador (19.8%, a difference of 0.22%), Belizean (19.9%, a difference of 0.36%), Cherokee (19.7%, a difference of 0.50%), Immigrants from Bangladesh (19.9%, a difference of 0.62%), and Jamaican (20.0%, a difference of 0.74%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 |
Iroquois | 0.1 /100 | #264 | Tragic 19.6% |
Guyanese | 0.1 /100 | #265 | Tragic 19.6% |
Immigrants | El Salvador | 0.1 /100 | #266 | Tragic 19.6% |
Vietnamese | 0.1 /100 | #267 | Tragic 19.6% |
Spanish American Indians | 0.1 /100 | #268 | Tragic 19.6% |
Immigrants | Cabo Verde | 0.1 /100 | #269 | Tragic 19.7% |
Cherokee | 0.1 /100 | #270 | Tragic 19.7% |
Chickasaw | 0.1 /100 | #271 | Tragic 19.8% |
Immigrants | Ecuador | 0.1 /100 | #272 | Tragic 19.8% |
Belizeans | 0.1 /100 | #273 | Tragic 19.9% |
Immigrants | Bangladesh | 0.0 /100 | #274 | Tragic 19.9% |
Jamaicans | 0.0 /100 | #275 | Tragic 20.0% |
Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.0 /100 | #276 | Tragic 20.0% |
Immigrants | Barbados | 0.0 /100 | #277 | Tragic 20.0% |
Immigrants | West Indies | 0.0 /100 | #278 | Tragic 20.0% |