New Zealander vs Turkish Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
COMPARE
New Zealander
Turkish
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Comparison
New Zealanders
Turks
15.6%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
87.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
140th/ 347
METRIC RANK
13.7%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
99.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
31st/ 347
METRIC RANK
New Zealander vs Turkish Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 106,265,230 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of New Zealanders and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.135 and weighted average of 15.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 267,627,928 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Turks and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.420 and weighted average of 13.7%, a difference of 13.7%.
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | New Zealander | Turkish |
Minimum | 4.2% | 0.50% |
Maximum | 52.9% | 71.9% |
Range | 48.7% | 71.4% |
Mean | 17.6% | 13.5% |
Median | 13.7% | 11.2% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 10.4% | 8.2% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 18.8% | 15.1% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 8.4% | 6.9% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 11.6% | 11.5% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 11.4% | 11.4% |
Similar Demographics by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Demographics Similar to New Zealanders by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to New Zealanders are Immigrants from Jordan (15.6%, a difference of 0.010%), Canadian (15.6%, a difference of 0.030%), Armenian (15.5%, a difference of 0.18%), Immigrants from Peru (15.6%, a difference of 0.18%), and Israeli (15.6%, a difference of 0.26%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
Brazilians | 89.6 /100 | #133 | Excellent 15.4% |
Immigrants | Spain | 89.1 /100 | #134 | Excellent 15.5% |
Czechoslovakians | 89.0 /100 | #135 | Excellent 15.5% |
Native Hawaiians | 89.0 /100 | #136 | Excellent 15.5% |
South Africans | 88.7 /100 | #137 | Excellent 15.5% |
Immigrants | Vietnam | 88.2 /100 | #138 | Excellent 15.5% |
Armenians | 87.9 /100 | #139 | Excellent 15.5% |
New Zealanders | 87.2 /100 | #140 | Excellent 15.6% |
Immigrants | Jordan | 87.2 /100 | #141 | Excellent 15.6% |
Canadians | 87.1 /100 | #142 | Excellent 15.6% |
Immigrants | Peru | 86.6 /100 | #143 | Excellent 15.6% |
Israelis | 86.3 /100 | #144 | Excellent 15.6% |
Welsh | 85.4 /100 | #145 | Excellent 15.6% |
Samoans | 84.2 /100 | #146 | Excellent 15.7% |
Slavs | 83.1 /100 | #147 | Excellent 15.7% |
Demographics Similar to Turks by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Turks are Danish (13.7%, a difference of 0.040%), Swedish (13.7%, a difference of 0.070%), Asian (13.7%, a difference of 0.12%), Maltese (13.7%, a difference of 0.13%), and Bolivian (13.6%, a difference of 0.79%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 99.9 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 13.4% |
Immigrants | China | 99.8 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 13.4% |
Eastern Europeans | 99.8 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 13.5% |
Latvians | 99.8 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 13.5% |
Tongans | 99.8 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 13.6% |
Bolivians | 99.8 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 13.6% |
Asians | 99.7 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 13.7% |
Turks | 99.7 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 13.7% |
Danes | 99.7 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 13.7% |
Swedes | 99.7 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 13.7% |
Maltese | 99.7 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 13.7% |
Immigrants | Northern Europe | 99.6 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 13.8% |
Russians | 99.6 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 13.9% |
Lithuanians | 99.6 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 13.9% |
Immigrants | Moldova | 99.6 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 13.9% |