Bermudan vs Australian Married-Couple Family Poverty
COMPARE
Bermudan
Australian
Married-Couple Family Poverty
Married-Couple Family Poverty Comparison
Bermudans
Australians
5.2%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
52.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
171st/ 347
METRIC RANK
4.3%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
99.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
48th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Bermudan vs Australian Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 55,613,061 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Bermudans and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.202 and weighted average of 5.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 222,779,850 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Australians and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.805 and weighted average of 4.3%, a difference of 20.6%.
Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Bermudan | Australian |
Minimum | 0.39% | 1.1% |
Maximum | 18.5% | 73.3% |
Range | 18.1% | 72.2% |
Mean | 5.3% | 6.5% |
Median | 4.9% | 4.1% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.5% | 3.2% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 6.6% | 5.9% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.1% | 2.7% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.7% | 10.7% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.6% | 10.6% |
Similar Demographics by Married-Couple Family Poverty
Demographics Similar to Bermudans by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Bermudans are Immigrants from Argentina (5.2%, a difference of 0.18%), Immigrants from Northern Africa (5.2%, a difference of 0.18%), Ottawa (5.2%, a difference of 0.19%), Alsatian (5.2%, a difference of 0.20%), and Immigrants from Uganda (5.2%, a difference of 0.23%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
Hawaiians | 62.3 /100 | #164 | Good 5.1% |
Immigrants | Malaysia | 62.2 /100 | #165 | Good 5.1% |
Paraguayans | 61.5 /100 | #166 | Good 5.1% |
Costa Ricans | 61.5 /100 | #167 | Good 5.1% |
Immigrants | Uganda | 54.9 /100 | #168 | Average 5.2% |
Ottawa | 54.5 /100 | #169 | Average 5.2% |
Immigrants | Argentina | 54.4 /100 | #170 | Average 5.2% |
Bermudans | 52.9 /100 | #171 | Average 5.2% |
Immigrants | Northern Africa | 51.3 /100 | #172 | Average 5.2% |
Alsatians | 51.2 /100 | #173 | Average 5.2% |
Immigrants | Eastern Africa | 50.0 /100 | #174 | Average 5.2% |
Marshallese | 47.9 /100 | #175 | Average 5.2% |
Menominee | 47.8 /100 | #176 | Average 5.2% |
Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 45.1 /100 | #177 | Average 5.2% |
Immigrants | Ukraine | 44.9 /100 | #178 | Average 5.2% |
Demographics Similar to Australians by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Australians are Immigrants from South Central Asia (4.3%, a difference of 0.070%), Turkish (4.3%, a difference of 0.080%), Burmese (4.3%, a difference of 0.18%), British (4.3%, a difference of 0.19%), and Immigrants from Lithuania (4.3%, a difference of 0.19%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
Northern Europeans | 99.8 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 4.3% |
Scottish | 99.8 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 4.3% |
Swiss | 99.8 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 4.3% |
Immigrants | Japan | 99.8 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 4.3% |
Serbians | 99.8 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 4.3% |
British | 99.8 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 4.3% |
Immigrants | South Central Asia | 99.8 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 4.3% |
Australians | 99.7 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 4.3% |
Turks | 99.7 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 4.3% |
Burmese | 99.7 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 4.3% |
Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.7 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 4.3% |
Russians | 99.7 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 4.3% |
Welsh | 99.7 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 4.3% |
Austrians | 99.7 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 4.3% |
French | 99.7 /100 | #55 | Exceptional 4.3% |