Immigrants from Uganda vs Pima Married-Couple Family Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Uganda
Pima
Married-Couple Family Poverty
Married-Couple Family Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Uganda
Pima
5.2%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
54.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
168th/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.4%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
343rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Uganda vs Pima Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 125,662,794 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Uganda and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.392 and weighted average of 5.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 61,466,640 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Pima and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.632 and weighted average of 11.4%, a difference of 119.8%.
Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Uganda | Pima |
Minimum | 0.25% | 3.6% |
Maximum | 22.9% | 100.0% |
Range | 22.6% | 96.4% |
Mean | 5.8% | 19.6% |
Median | 4.5% | 9.9% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.2% | 6.4% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 5.7% | 23.4% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.5% | 17.0% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.7% | 23.2% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.6% | 22.7% |
Similar Demographics by Married-Couple Family Poverty
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Uganda by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Uganda are Ottawa (5.2%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Argentina (5.2%, a difference of 0.060%), Bermudan (5.2%, a difference of 0.23%), Immigrants from Northern Africa (5.2%, a difference of 0.41%), and Alsatian (5.2%, a difference of 0.43%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
Ethiopians | 68.1 /100 | #161 | Good 5.1% |
Immigrants | Jordan | 66.5 /100 | #162 | Good 5.1% |
Sierra Leoneans | 64.1 /100 | #163 | Good 5.1% |
Hawaiians | 62.3 /100 | #164 | Good 5.1% |
Immigrants | Malaysia | 62.2 /100 | #165 | Good 5.1% |
Paraguayans | 61.5 /100 | #166 | Good 5.1% |
Costa Ricans | 61.5 /100 | #167 | Good 5.1% |
Immigrants | Uganda | 54.9 /100 | #168 | Average 5.2% |
Ottawa | 54.5 /100 | #169 | Average 5.2% |
Immigrants | Argentina | 54.4 /100 | #170 | Average 5.2% |
Bermudans | 52.9 /100 | #171 | Average 5.2% |
Immigrants | Northern Africa | 51.3 /100 | #172 | Average 5.2% |
Alsatians | 51.2 /100 | #173 | Average 5.2% |
Immigrants | Eastern Africa | 50.0 /100 | #174 | Average 5.2% |
Marshallese | 47.9 /100 | #175 | Average 5.2% |
Demographics Similar to Pima by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Pima are Tohono O'odham (11.2%, a difference of 1.7%), Pueblo (11.1%, a difference of 2.6%), Navajo (11.9%, a difference of 3.9%), Puerto Rican (12.6%, a difference of 10.8%), and Immigrants from Yemen (12.8%, a difference of 12.2%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 8.3% |
Immigrants | Dominican Republic | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 8.4% |
Sioux | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 8.7% |
Apache | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 9.0% |
Yakama | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 9.0% |
Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 9.4% |
Crow | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 9.6% |
Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 9.7% |
Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 11.1% |
Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 11.2% |
Pima | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 11.4% |
Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 11.9% |
Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 12.6% |
Immigrants | Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 12.8% |
Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #347 | Tragic 13.4% |