Immigrants from Uganda vs Pima Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Uganda
Pima
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Uganda
Pima
5.7%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
99.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
67th/ 347
METRIC RANK
8.2%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
339th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Uganda vs Pima Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 125,972,414 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Uganda and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.004 and weighted average of 5.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 61,538,415 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Pima and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.261 and weighted average of 8.2%, a difference of 45.7%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Uganda | Pima |
| Minimum | 0.18% | 3.8% |
| Maximum | 15.5% | 29.5% |
| Range | 15.3% | 25.7% |
| Mean | 5.8% | 11.0% |
| Median | 5.6% | 8.6% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.1% | 6.7% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 7.0% | 12.4% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.9% | 5.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.8% | 6.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.8% | 6.2% |
Similar Demographics by Ambulatory Disability
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Uganda by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Uganda are Israeli (5.7%, a difference of 0.010%), Sri Lankan (5.7%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Switzerland (5.7%, a difference of 0.11%), Laotian (5.7%, a difference of 0.13%), and Immigrants from France (5.6%, a difference of 0.26%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.8 /100 | #60 | Exceptional 5.6% |
| Immigrants | Belgium | 99.7 /100 | #61 | Exceptional 5.6% |
| Immigrants | Spain | 99.7 /100 | #62 | Exceptional 5.6% |
| Immigrants | France | 99.7 /100 | #63 | Exceptional 5.6% |
| Laotians | 99.7 /100 | #64 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| Immigrants | Switzerland | 99.7 /100 | #65 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| Israelis | 99.6 /100 | #66 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| Immigrants | Uganda | 99.6 /100 | #67 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| Sri Lankans | 99.6 /100 | #68 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| Peruvians | 99.5 /100 | #69 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| Sierra Leoneans | 99.4 /100 | #70 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| Immigrants | Peru | 99.4 /100 | #71 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| Brazilians | 99.4 /100 | #72 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| Immigrants | Northern Africa | 99.4 /100 | #73 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| Immigrants | Cameroon | 99.4 /100 | #74 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Demographics Similar to Pima by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Pima are Colville (8.2%, a difference of 0.35%), Choctaw (8.3%, a difference of 0.83%), Dutch West Indian (8.2%, a difference of 0.92%), Creek (8.5%, a difference of 2.5%), and Seminole (8.0%, a difference of 2.6%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
| Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 7.8% |
| Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 7.9% |
| Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 7.9% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 8.0% |
| Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 8.0% |
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 8.2% |
| Colville | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 8.2% |
| Pima | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 8.2% |
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 8.3% |
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 8.5% |
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 8.6% |
| Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 8.7% |
| Tsimshian | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 8.8% |
| Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 8.9% |
| Houma | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 9.3% |