Blackfeet vs Pima Married-Couple Family Poverty
COMPARE
Blackfeet
Pima
Married-Couple Family Poverty
Married-Couple Family Poverty Comparison
Blackfeet
Pima
6.2%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
0.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
265th/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.4%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
343rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Blackfeet vs Pima Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 307,833,949 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Blackfeet and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.451 and weighted average of 6.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 61,466,640 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Pima and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.632 and weighted average of 11.4%, a difference of 85.0%.
Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Blackfeet | Pima |
| Minimum | 3.1% | 3.6% |
| Maximum | 58.6% | 100.0% |
| Range | 55.5% | 96.4% |
| Mean | 16.2% | 19.6% |
| Median | 12.2% | 9.9% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 9.0% | 6.4% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 21.8% | 23.4% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 12.8% | 17.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 11.2% | 23.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 11.1% | 22.7% |
Similar Demographics by Married-Couple Family Poverty
Demographics Similar to Blackfeet by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Blackfeet are Creek (6.2%, a difference of 0.080%), Spanish American (6.2%, a difference of 0.13%), Immigrants from Congo (6.1%, a difference of 0.43%), Alaska Native (6.2%, a difference of 0.61%), and Immigrants from Senegal (6.1%, a difference of 0.66%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
| Immigrants | Immigrants | 0.5 /100 | #258 | Tragic 6.0% |
| Alaskan Athabascans | 0.4 /100 | #259 | Tragic 6.1% |
| Jamaicans | 0.3 /100 | #260 | Tragic 6.1% |
| Senegalese | 0.3 /100 | #261 | Tragic 6.1% |
| Shoshone | 0.3 /100 | #262 | Tragic 6.1% |
| Immigrants | Senegal | 0.3 /100 | #263 | Tragic 6.1% |
| Immigrants | Congo | 0.2 /100 | #264 | Tragic 6.1% |
| Blackfeet | 0.2 /100 | #265 | Tragic 6.2% |
| Creek | 0.2 /100 | #266 | Tragic 6.2% |
| Spanish Americans | 0.2 /100 | #267 | Tragic 6.2% |
| Alaska Natives | 0.2 /100 | #268 | Tragic 6.2% |
| Immigrants | West Indies | 0.1 /100 | #269 | Tragic 6.2% |
| Immigrants | Jamaica | 0.1 /100 | #270 | Tragic 6.2% |
| Immigrants | Bahamas | 0.1 /100 | #271 | Tragic 6.2% |
| Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 0.1 /100 | #272 | Tragic 6.2% |
Demographics Similar to Pima by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Pima are Tohono O'odham (11.2%, a difference of 1.7%), Pueblo (11.1%, a difference of 2.6%), Navajo (11.9%, a difference of 3.9%), Puerto Rican (12.6%, a difference of 10.8%), and Immigrants from Yemen (12.8%, a difference of 12.2%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
| Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 8.3% |
| Immigrants | Dominican Republic | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 8.4% |
| Sioux | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 8.7% |
| Apache | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 9.0% |
| Yakama | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 9.0% |
| Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 9.4% |
| Crow | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 9.6% |
| Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 9.7% |
| Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 11.1% |
| Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 11.2% |
| Pima | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 11.4% |
| Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 11.9% |
| Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 12.6% |
| Immigrants | Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 12.8% |
| Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #347 | Tragic 13.4% |