Scotch-Irish vs Pima Married-Couple Family Poverty
COMPARE
Scotch-Irish
Pima
Married-Couple Family Poverty
Married-Couple Family Poverty Comparison
Scotch-Irish
Pima
4.5%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
99.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
78th/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.4%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
343rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Scotch-Irish vs Pima Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 536,697,572 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Scotch-Irish and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.773 and weighted average of 4.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 61,466,640 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Pima and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.632 and weighted average of 11.4%, a difference of 152.7%.
Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Scotch-Irish | Pima |
Minimum | 1.4% | 3.6% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
Range | 98.6% | 96.4% |
Mean | 14.9% | 19.6% |
Median | 8.5% | 9.9% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.1% | 6.4% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 17.0% | 23.4% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 11.9% | 17.0% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 17.2% | 23.2% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 17.1% | 22.7% |
Similar Demographics by Married-Couple Family Poverty
Demographics Similar to Scotch-Irish by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Scotch-Irish are Immigrants from Latvia (4.5%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Iran (4.5%, a difference of 0.23%), Immigrants from South Africa (4.5%, a difference of 0.25%), Icelander (4.5%, a difference of 0.29%), and Cambodian (4.5%, a difference of 0.36%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
Immigrants | North America | 99.3 /100 | #71 | Exceptional 4.5% |
Immigrants | England | 99.3 /100 | #72 | Exceptional 4.5% |
Ukrainians | 99.2 /100 | #73 | Exceptional 4.5% |
Immigrants | Austria | 99.2 /100 | #74 | Exceptional 4.5% |
Cambodians | 99.2 /100 | #75 | Exceptional 4.5% |
Immigrants | South Africa | 99.1 /100 | #76 | Exceptional 4.5% |
Immigrants | Latvia | 99.1 /100 | #77 | Exceptional 4.5% |
Scotch-Irish | 99.1 /100 | #78 | Exceptional 4.5% |
Immigrants | Iran | 99.0 /100 | #79 | Exceptional 4.5% |
Icelanders | 99.0 /100 | #80 | Exceptional 4.5% |
Immigrants | Greece | 98.9 /100 | #81 | Exceptional 4.5% |
Canadians | 98.8 /100 | #82 | Exceptional 4.5% |
Immigrants | Denmark | 98.8 /100 | #83 | Exceptional 4.6% |
Immigrants | Croatia | 98.7 /100 | #84 | Exceptional 4.6% |
South Africans | 98.7 /100 | #85 | Exceptional 4.6% |
Demographics Similar to Pima by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Pima are Tohono O'odham (11.2%, a difference of 1.7%), Pueblo (11.1%, a difference of 2.6%), Navajo (11.9%, a difference of 3.9%), Puerto Rican (12.6%, a difference of 10.8%), and Immigrants from Yemen (12.8%, a difference of 12.2%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 8.3% |
Immigrants | Dominican Republic | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 8.4% |
Sioux | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 8.7% |
Apache | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 9.0% |
Yakama | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 9.0% |
Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 9.4% |
Crow | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 9.6% |
Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 9.7% |
Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 11.1% |
Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 11.2% |
Pima | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 11.4% |
Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 11.9% |
Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 12.6% |
Immigrants | Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 12.8% |
Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #347 | Tragic 13.4% |