Immigrants from Liberia vs Chinese Male Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Liberia
Chinese
Male Poverty
Male Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Liberia
Chinese
13.0%
MALE POVERTY
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
255th/ 347
METRIC RANK
8.7%
MALE POVERTY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
2nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Liberia vs Chinese Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 135,246,514 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Liberia and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.604 and weighted average of 13.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,801,112 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Chinese and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.236 and weighted average of 8.7%, a difference of 49.6%.
Male Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Liberia | Chinese |
| Minimum | 3.0% | 1.3% |
| Maximum | 40.3% | 29.4% |
| Range | 37.2% | 28.2% |
| Mean | 13.8% | 9.7% |
| Median | 11.4% | 8.9% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 9.8% | 4.8% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 16.4% | 12.4% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.6% | 7.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.8% | 6.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.8% | 6.4% |
Similar Demographics by Male Poverty
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Liberia by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Liberia are Mexican American Indian (13.0%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar (13.0%, a difference of 0.20%), Immigrants from Ghana (12.9%, a difference of 0.47%), Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago (13.1%, a difference of 0.47%), and Immigrants from Ecuador (12.9%, a difference of 0.53%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty |
| Immigrants | Sudan | 0.2 /100 | #248 | Tragic 12.9% |
| Potawatomi | 0.2 /100 | #249 | Tragic 12.9% |
| Immigrants | Nicaragua | 0.2 /100 | #250 | Tragic 12.9% |
| Immigrants | Cuba | 0.2 /100 | #251 | Tragic 12.9% |
| Immigrants | Ecuador | 0.2 /100 | #252 | Tragic 12.9% |
| Immigrants | Ghana | 0.2 /100 | #253 | Tragic 12.9% |
| Mexican American Indians | 0.1 /100 | #254 | Tragic 13.0% |
| Immigrants | Liberia | 0.1 /100 | #255 | Tragic 13.0% |
| Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 0.1 /100 | #256 | Tragic 13.0% |
| Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 0.1 /100 | #257 | Tragic 13.1% |
| Cape Verdeans | 0.1 /100 | #258 | Tragic 13.1% |
| Cherokee | 0.1 /100 | #259 | Tragic 13.1% |
| Ottawa | 0.1 /100 | #260 | Tragic 13.1% |
| Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 0.1 /100 | #261 | Tragic 13.1% |
| Spanish American Indians | 0.1 /100 | #262 | Tragic 13.1% |
Demographics Similar to Chinese by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chinese are Thai (8.7%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Taiwan (8.9%, a difference of 2.4%), Maltese (9.1%, a difference of 4.4%), Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac (9.1%, a difference of 5.1%), and Immigrants from Ireland (9.1%, a difference of 5.2%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty |
| Immigrants | India | 100.0 /100 | #1 | Exceptional 8.2% |
| Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #2 | Exceptional 8.7% |
| Thais | 100.0 /100 | #3 | Exceptional 8.7% |
| Immigrants | Taiwan | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 8.9% |
| Maltese | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 9.1% |
| Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 99.9 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 9.1% |
| Immigrants | Ireland | 99.9 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 9.1% |
| Filipinos | 99.9 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 9.2% |
| Immigrants | South Central Asia | 99.9 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 9.3% |
| Bulgarians | 99.9 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 9.3% |
| Bolivians | 99.9 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 9.4% |
| Immigrants | Bolivia | 99.9 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 9.4% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.9 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 9.4% |
| Immigrants | North Macedonia | 99.8 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 9.4% |
| Bhutanese | 99.8 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 9.5% |