Immigrants from Liberia vs Scottish Married-Couple Family Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Liberia
Scottish
Married-Couple Family Poverty
Married-Couple Family Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Liberia
Scottish
5.5%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
13.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
213th/ 347
METRIC RANK
4.3%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
99.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
42nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Liberia vs Scottish Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 134,804,518 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Liberia and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.212 and weighted average of 5.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 552,662,179 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Scottish and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.687 and weighted average of 4.3%, a difference of 29.0%.
Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Liberia | Scottish |
Minimum | 0.42% | 2.6% |
Maximum | 29.8% | 100.0% |
Range | 29.4% | 97.4% |
Mean | 5.8% | 18.6% |
Median | 4.9% | 8.2% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.6% | 5.4% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 6.8% | 22.2% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.2% | 16.8% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.5% | 22.5% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.4% | 22.4% |
Similar Demographics by Married-Couple Family Poverty
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Liberia by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Liberia are Iroquois (5.5%, a difference of 0.040%), Armenian (5.5%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Thailand (5.5%, a difference of 0.18%), Potawatomi (5.5%, a difference of 0.23%), and Nigerian (5.5%, a difference of 0.25%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
Osage | 18.4 /100 | #206 | Poor 5.4% |
Immigrants | Africa | 17.6 /100 | #207 | Poor 5.5% |
French American Indians | 16.1 /100 | #208 | Poor 5.5% |
Immigrants | Syria | 15.4 /100 | #209 | Poor 5.5% |
Immigrants | Micronesia | 14.4 /100 | #210 | Poor 5.5% |
Nigerians | 14.3 /100 | #211 | Poor 5.5% |
Immigrants | Thailand | 14.0 /100 | #212 | Poor 5.5% |
Immigrants | Liberia | 13.3 /100 | #213 | Poor 5.5% |
Iroquois | 13.1 /100 | #214 | Poor 5.5% |
Armenians | 12.8 /100 | #215 | Poor 5.5% |
Potawatomi | 12.4 /100 | #216 | Poor 5.5% |
Immigrants | Nigeria | 11.3 /100 | #217 | Poor 5.5% |
Afghans | 11.2 /100 | #218 | Poor 5.5% |
Japanese | 9.8 /100 | #219 | Tragic 5.6% |
Colombians | 9.2 /100 | #220 | Tragic 5.6% |
Demographics Similar to Scottish by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Scottish are Northern European (4.3%, a difference of 0.16%), French Canadian (4.2%, a difference of 0.41%), Swiss (4.3%, a difference of 0.44%), Immigrants from Northern Europe (4.2%, a difference of 0.70%), and Immigrants from Japan (4.3%, a difference of 0.81%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
Europeans | 99.9 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 4.2% |
English | 99.9 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 4.2% |
Iranians | 99.9 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 4.2% |
Belgians | 99.9 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 4.2% |
Immigrants | Northern Europe | 99.8 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 4.2% |
French Canadians | 99.8 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 4.2% |
Northern Europeans | 99.8 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 4.3% |
Scottish | 99.8 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 4.3% |
Swiss | 99.8 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 4.3% |
Immigrants | Japan | 99.8 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 4.3% |
Serbians | 99.8 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 4.3% |
British | 99.8 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 4.3% |
Immigrants | South Central Asia | 99.8 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 4.3% |
Australians | 99.7 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 4.3% |
Turks | 99.7 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 4.3% |