Immigrants from Ethiopia vs Colombian Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Ethiopia
Colombian
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Ethiopia
Colombians
20.0%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
95.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
119th/ 347
METRIC RANK
19.9%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
96.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
109th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Ethiopia vs Colombian Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 210,222,797 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Ethiopia and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.027 and weighted average of 20.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 412,800,850 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Colombians and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.355 and weighted average of 19.9%, a difference of 0.49%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Ethiopia | Colombian |
| Minimum | 9.4% | 9.2% |
| Maximum | 33.7% | 51.3% |
| Range | 24.3% | 42.2% |
| Mean | 19.6% | 19.9% |
| Median | 19.0% | 19.0% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 17.1% | 17.2% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 21.9% | 21.3% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.8% | 4.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.6% | 6.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.5% | 6.0% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Ethiopia and Colombians by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Ethiopia are Immigrants from Afghanistan (20.0%, a difference of 0.0%), Polish (20.0%, a difference of 0.080%), South American (20.0%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Kazakhstan (20.0%, a difference of 0.12%), and Immigrants from Switzerland (20.0%, a difference of 0.13%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Colombians are Native Hawaiian (19.9%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Western Asia (19.9%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Syria (19.9%, a difference of 0.060%), Ethiopian (19.9%, a difference of 0.070%), and Israeli (19.9%, a difference of 0.17%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Chileans | 96.9 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 19.9% |
| Israelis | 96.9 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 19.9% |
| Ethiopians | 96.7 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 19.9% |
| Immigrants | Syria | 96.7 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 19.9% |
| Native Hawaiians | 96.6 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 19.9% |
| Colombians | 96.6 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 19.9% |
| Immigrants | Western Asia | 96.5 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 19.9% |
| Carpatho Rusyns | 96.1 /100 | #111 | Exceptional 20.0% |
| Immigrants | Netherlands | 96.0 /100 | #112 | Exceptional 20.0% |
| Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 95.9 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 20.0% |
| Immigrants | Colombia | 95.9 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 20.0% |
| Immigrants | Northern Africa | 95.8 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 20.0% |
| Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 95.7 /100 | #116 | Exceptional 20.0% |
| Poles | 95.6 /100 | #117 | Exceptional 20.0% |
| Immigrants | Afghanistan | 95.4 /100 | #118 | Exceptional 20.0% |
| Immigrants | Ethiopia | 95.4 /100 | #119 | Exceptional 20.0% |
| South Americans | 95.1 /100 | #120 | Exceptional 20.0% |
| Immigrants | Switzerland | 95.1 /100 | #121 | Exceptional 20.0% |
| Immigrants | South America | 95.0 /100 | #122 | Exceptional 20.0% |
| Brazilians | 94.4 /100 | #123 | Exceptional 20.1% |
| Immigrants | Chile | 94.3 /100 | #124 | Exceptional 20.1% |