Greek vs Palestinian Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Greek
Palestinian
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Greeks
Palestinians
19.4%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
99.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
86th/ 347
METRIC RANK
19.2%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
99.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
66th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Greek vs Palestinian Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 470,908,481 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Greeks and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.314 and weighted average of 19.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 214,894,692 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Palestinians and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.034 and weighted average of 19.2%, a difference of 1.1%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Greek | Palestinian |
Minimum | 10.0% | 2.6% |
Maximum | 76.9% | 53.6% |
Range | 66.9% | 51.0% |
Mean | 26.2% | 21.7% |
Median | 18.9% | 19.1% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 15.7% | 14.2% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 31.5% | 28.9% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 15.8% | 14.7% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 17.0% | 11.7% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 16.7% | 11.6% |
Demographics Similar to Greeks and Palestinians by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Greeks are Immigrants from Albania (19.4%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Sweden (19.4%, a difference of 0.040%), Taiwanese (19.4%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Scotland (19.4%, a difference of 0.14%), and Immigrants from Malaysia (19.4%, a difference of 0.14%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Palestinians are Immigrants from Egypt (19.2%, a difference of 0.040%), Laotian (19.3%, a difference of 0.080%), Paraguayan (19.3%, a difference of 0.33%), Immigrants from Jordan (19.3%, a difference of 0.39%), and Immigrants from South Eastern Asia (19.3%, a difference of 0.46%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
Palestinians | 99.6 /100 | #66 | Exceptional 19.2% |
Immigrants | Egypt | 99.6 /100 | #67 | Exceptional 19.2% |
Laotians | 99.5 /100 | #68 | Exceptional 19.3% |
Paraguayans | 99.5 /100 | #69 | Exceptional 19.3% |
Immigrants | Jordan | 99.4 /100 | #70 | Exceptional 19.3% |
Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 99.4 /100 | #71 | Exceptional 19.3% |
Immigrants | Latvia | 99.4 /100 | #72 | Exceptional 19.3% |
Immigrants | Peru | 99.4 /100 | #73 | Exceptional 19.3% |
Immigrants | Belarus | 99.4 /100 | #74 | Exceptional 19.3% |
Immigrants | Turkey | 99.4 /100 | #75 | Exceptional 19.4% |
Peruvians | 99.4 /100 | #76 | Exceptional 19.4% |
Immigrants | Russia | 99.3 /100 | #77 | Exceptional 19.4% |
Albanians | 99.3 /100 | #78 | Exceptional 19.4% |
Immigrants | Sierra Leone | 99.3 /100 | #79 | Exceptional 19.4% |
Immigrants | Australia | 99.3 /100 | #80 | Exceptional 19.4% |
Immigrants | Scotland | 99.2 /100 | #81 | Exceptional 19.4% |
Immigrants | Malaysia | 99.2 /100 | #82 | Exceptional 19.4% |
Taiwanese | 99.2 /100 | #83 | Exceptional 19.4% |
Immigrants | Sweden | 99.2 /100 | #84 | Exceptional 19.4% |
Immigrants | Albania | 99.2 /100 | #85 | Exceptional 19.4% |
Greeks | 99.2 /100 | #86 | Exceptional 19.4% |