Chickasaw vs Iroquois Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
COMPARE
Chickasaw
Iroquois
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Comparison
Chickasaw
Iroquois
19.6%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
262nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
20.4%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
286th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Chickasaw vs Iroquois Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 146,952,830 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.542 and weighted average of 19.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 205,253,116 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Iroquois and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.543 and weighted average of 20.4%, a difference of 4.1%.

Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Chickasaw | Iroquois |
Minimum | 3.8% | 6.4% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
Range | 96.2% | 93.6% |
Mean | 26.8% | 36.4% |
Median | 21.7% | 25.4% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 17.6% | 18.2% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 31.3% | 41.1% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 13.6% | 22.9% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 15.5% | 28.7% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 15.4% | 28.3% |
Similar Demographics by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar (19.7%, a difference of 0.12%), Jamaican (19.7%, a difference of 0.23%), Vietnamese (19.5%, a difference of 0.52%), Mexican American Indian (19.5%, a difference of 0.61%), and Immigrants from Jamaica (19.8%, a difference of 0.67%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
Immigrants | Ecuador | 0.3 /100 | #255 | Tragic 19.3% |
Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 0.2 /100 | #256 | Tragic 19.3% |
Guyanese | 0.2 /100 | #257 | Tragic 19.4% |
Salvadorans | 0.2 /100 | #258 | Tragic 19.4% |
Ottawa | 0.2 /100 | #259 | Tragic 19.4% |
Mexican American Indians | 0.2 /100 | #260 | Tragic 19.5% |
Vietnamese | 0.2 /100 | #261 | Tragic 19.5% |
Chickasaw | 0.1 /100 | #262 | Tragic 19.6% |
Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 0.1 /100 | #263 | Tragic 19.7% |
Jamaicans | 0.1 /100 | #264 | Tragic 19.7% |
Immigrants | Jamaica | 0.1 /100 | #265 | Tragic 19.8% |
Spanish Americans | 0.1 /100 | #266 | Tragic 19.8% |
Immigrants | Bangladesh | 0.1 /100 | #267 | Tragic 19.9% |
Spanish American Indians | 0.1 /100 | #268 | Tragic 19.9% |
Liberians | 0.1 /100 | #269 | Tragic 19.9% |
Demographics Similar to Iroquois by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Iroquois are Blackfeet (20.5%, a difference of 0.14%), Haitian (20.5%, a difference of 0.34%), Immigrants from Cabo Verde (20.3%, a difference of 0.39%), Yaqui (20.3%, a difference of 0.53%), and Senegalese (20.3%, a difference of 0.56%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
Immigrants | Zaire | 0.0 /100 | #279 | Tragic 20.2% |
Immigrants | Liberia | 0.0 /100 | #280 | Tragic 20.2% |
Central Americans | 0.0 /100 | #281 | Tragic 20.2% |
West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #282 | Tragic 20.3% |
Senegalese | 0.0 /100 | #283 | Tragic 20.3% |
Yaqui | 0.0 /100 | #284 | Tragic 20.3% |
Immigrants | Cabo Verde | 0.0 /100 | #285 | Tragic 20.3% |
Iroquois | 0.0 /100 | #286 | Tragic 20.4% |
Blackfeet | 0.0 /100 | #287 | Tragic 20.5% |
Haitians | 0.0 /100 | #288 | Tragic 20.5% |
Immigrants | Belize | 0.0 /100 | #289 | Tragic 20.6% |
Immigrants | Haiti | 0.0 /100 | #290 | Tragic 20.6% |
Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #291 | Tragic 20.6% |
Immigrants | Latin America | 0.0 /100 | #292 | Tragic 20.6% |
Immigrants | Grenada | 0.0 /100 | #293 | Tragic 20.7% |